Kindly refute the referenced statement if you or any of your merry band of deriders is capable. You resort to epithets quickly.
I will list the post that you are referring to. Note that my post was NOT to you. However, if you do not see the ignorance of the post, as they say, the shoe fits ...
1. Residual heat in the Earth. Lord Kelvin demonstrated that if the Earth was more than fifty million years old, the Earth would have cooled down to ambient temperature. In response, evolutionists proposed that radioactives in the Earth's core have kept it warm for 4.5 billion years. In other words, creationists accurately predict the current volcanic state of Earth, while evolutionists must invoke an unproven process -- a violation of Occam's Razor.
Educate me, wise one. Refute the statement.
This should be an easy task for you. Either demonstrate the statement regarding Kelvin was in error or if true Kelvin's demonstration was wrong. Call in your Big Guns if need be. Whatever you do, for once in your life offer something more to the debate than derision or dripping sarcasm.
I grow weary of your non-stop insults to those who profess their faith. Put up or shut up . . .