Posted on 08/27/2005 6:27:10 PM PDT by Texas_Conservative2
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has filed a lawsuit to force top makers of potato chips and french fries to warn consumers about a potential cancer-causing chemical found in the popular snacks. ADVERTISEMENT
In a complaint filed on Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Lockyer sought an injunction to stop restaurant chains such as McDonald's Corp. and Wendy's International Inc. from selling french fries without some form of warning.
Also named were producers of potato chips and other packaged potato products like PepsiCo's Frito-Lay Inc. and Procter & Gamble Co., makers of Pringles chips.
The suit asks manufacturers of these products to identify the dangers of high levels of acrylamide, a chemical that studies have found is created when starchy foods are cooked at high heat.
"I know from personal experience that, while these snacks may not be a necessary part of a healthy diet, they sure taste good," Lockyer said in a statement. "But I, and all consumers, should have the information we need to make informed decisions about the food we eat."
The lawsuit alleges that companies have violated a state law passed in 1986 requiring companies to provide warnings before exposing people to known carcinogens or reproductive toxins.
In 2002, scientists found potatoes and other starchy foods cooked at high temperatures contained low levels of acrylamide. Other studies have discounted the potential toxicity of acrylamide to humans.
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT STUDYING ACRYLAMIDE LEVELS
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is studying the impact of acrylamide levels in food. In a March press release, the FDA said "acrylamide can cause cancer in laboratory animals at high doses, although it is not clear whether it causes cancer in humans at the much lower levels found in food."
Acrylamide is also widely used for industrial purposes, including sewage treatment.
Other defendants named in the suit include Burger King Corp., KFC Corp., a unit of Yum Brands Inc., for its KFC Potato Wedges, Kettle Foods Inc., makers of Kettle chips, which bills itself as a natural health food brand, and Cape Cod Potato Chips Co. of Hyannis, Massachusetts, a unit of Lance Inc..
In June, a California consumer group pressed the attorney general's office to take this action. At that time, Frito-Lay issued a statement saying its "food safety standards are very stringent and meet all federal and state regulations."
Procter & Gamble spokeswoman Kay Puryear said company researchers have been investigating issues raised by the 2002 acrylamide study, she said.
"Acrylamide is available whether those foods are prepared in a restaurant, at home or by the packaged goods industry," she said. "We stand behind, and absolutely think, our products are as safe as ever."
Burger King spokeswoman Edna Johnson said she had not seen the suit because her company's Miami headquarters had been closed in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. "As a matter of company policy we don't comment on pending legal matters," she said.
Spokesmen for McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Cape Cod Potato Chips, Yum Brands and Kettle Foods were not immediately available to comment on Saturday.
Under state law, the attorney general's suit supersedes private claims filed by environmental groups in recent years against some of the same defendants.
California, HUMM...
The CA AG was directed by former Gray Davis, to not pursue appeals of Prop. 187.
The will of the voters, towards paying the costs of illegal immigrants was at stake.
I would rather the AG protect my ppocketbook from illegal costs, then french fries (correctly called "pommes frites" for fried potatoes, by the french).
One thing to remember is that California is also the home of Free Republic: thank God for Jim Robinson, Fresno.
Lawyers.... screwing up America for everyone else....
How about the AG making certain that all vegetables grown in California are NOT picked by illegal aliens, instead of wasting taxpayer money on this French-fry nonsense?
"I thought we were suppose to eat vegetables?"
Potatoes are not vegetables, they are tubers.
My kids live in the Bay area and are ready to come home. Too many weird fruits and nuts - I guess that is a redundancy in discussing that part of CA.
Is this what passes for logic in California?
Seriously, isn't this proposal what legal folks call arbitrary and capricious? Why aren't all fries prepared under defined conditions included?
Oh, I KNOW!! Our taxes at work here. Gotta go to In&Out right now. (the best french fries in So Cal).
Ah, good ol' selective indignation from the Attorney General who (as I recall) never actually practiced law.
Some questions come to mind.
First, why no mention of coffee or breakfast cereal or other foods with measurable levels of acrylamide?
Second, why no lawsuit to warn unsuspecting victims of fast food robberbarrons about hyperinsulinemia, metabolic syndrome x, or diabetes from fries and potato(e) chips and other such starchy junk foods?
I suspect very strongly that our alleged Attorney General is trying to build up his pre-gubernatorial election resume. (To which I'm happy to report...FAT chance!) The other little irony is that unless Lockyer has been hitting the gym, he looks every bit the part of one who is no stranger to fries and chips (and super-sized at that).
.
I read this story this morning and it just seems so ridiculous. You could make a warning label for everything in life. This acrylamide occurs naturally, which means its been in food we've been eating since the dawn of time. We don't need more of these nanny state rules.
Then they had better be targeting all the vendors at the CA State Fair - who's motto on advertizing has been 'everything here's deep fat fried'.
One hopes they are not malignant tubers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.