Posted on 08/27/2005 4:04:29 AM PDT by johnny7
This is truly irritating. We are at the beginning of the the unfolding of the AB story but we have Chavez musing that we may never know what they learned.
Chavez should never have written an article exposing her ignorance in such a way.
Washington DC "insiders" ALWAYS provide cover for their own. DC is corrupt through and through. THAT is why NOTHING of merit EVER get's done there.
You're probably right. OTOH Dan Rather was once considered a powerful man backed by a powerful organization. OTOOH half of the powerful people were not supporting Danny Boy at that time.
Nevertheless, I hope we get the name of that 2-star general who squashed the info and made sure the FBI didn't get it even when they were ready to accept it.
We have a large number of really good researchers and investigators at FR. Some of them are retired LEOs. That 2-star has to be exposed and driven out along with whoever appointed him/her and was allied with him/her.
Good stuff on that blog. thanks.
If the DIA
identified terrorists
within the US,
how come they didn't
deal with them right then and there?!
My understanding
is that issues with
"national security"
at their core do not
have the exact same
legal "entanglements" that
normal crimes work with.
If the DIA
pin-pointed terrorist cells
within the US,
then why didn't they
arrange black ops "accidents"
when they knew the score?!
General Shoomaker is currently the Army Chief of Staff. Shoomaker was in on the Clinton's 'final-solution' for Waco. He's been active in Special Forces since the failed, Iran hostage rescue(Carter).
If he doesn't want something to come out of this... it won't.
Again, the very stupidest thing Bush has done and continues to do is to allow Clibtonistas to function in his government. EVERY CLINTONISTA SHOULD HAVE BEEN PURGED FROM DAY ONE! The Clintonistas still in the administration, just like Berger, are there to destroy evidence that will help incriminate Willie and his wife! GET RID OF THE REMAINING CLINTONISTAS N O W!!!
If Schoomaker(sp?) was part of the Waco assualt, then he must be best buddies with that other notable Clinton general, Wesley Clark...Lots of rear guard action to cover for Clinton here...?!
Also, what is going on? In addition to this wimpy article by Linda Chavez trying to stear us away from AD, Hugh Hewitt won't discuss it. His latest reason why is that if there is any truth "there" it will come out. Outrageous! No, Hugh, it won't come out if you, and others, are trying so hard to tamp it down.
The only way this story has real staying power is if the considerable power of the people is mobilized with the help of ALL who have a national voice.
Wow! Isn't this helpful!
Why can't some of these repubs who don't know anything about Able Danger just shut up ..??
see my post #32
Chinagate links to Able Danger starting to appear:
MILITARY 'SPIED' ON RICE (More Able Danger leaks from Specter staffers)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1471803/posts
What is the dark hidden mass about which all these orbit? C.H.I.N.A
Jamie Gorelick was placed on the commission precisely to make sure that the door to China corruption was never opened.
You may remember that when Mr. Schippers took the evidence of Chinese corruption to the Senate during the impeachment trial preparations, Trent Lott and others told him not to touch that and just to stick to the sexual stuff. Both parties have suckled at the Chinese teat. Read Who Sold Us Out to China, an old essay of mine that touches on a few of these items.
Linda Chavez' attenmpted debunking of Able Danger in the Washington Times today is intended to protect certain Republicans, who like Clinton, were on the take from the Chinese.
<< I like Linda Chavez .... >>
Do you like Armstrong Williams, too?
I used to like them both, too and as often as not gave each the benefit of any doubt I felt about anything either had to say. Until each in his turn, "blew it."
Like Armstrong, Chavez was long-ago compromised by her own actions. Now being restored to [East-Coast "Establishment"] popularity tends more-and-more to drive her.
BTTT
I didn't have much of an opinion on Chavez... all I knew was that she was a Republican.
I DO think her dismissive attitude here is puzzling and uncalled for.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.