No one questions adaptation within a species.
The only liars are the evolutionists who are so intent to deny God's word that they will conjure up a fantasy that man came from rocks. No. That's your version. Man from dirt in one afternoon. You don't know yours from ours. You are giving pig-ignorance a bad name.
And so where did life originate from liar for Lucifer?
So nothing within the mechanisms generating change within a species is supposed to be impossible? So we have a mechanism that's guaranteed to produce divergence in gene pools isolated from each other in slowly changing conditions. We got that, right?
You accept the mechanism, but not how long/far it can operate?
Is something supposed to be impossible here? This is your alternate science?
Brain working a little slowly this morning, I actually considered it might be worthwhile to drag in some papers on abiogenesis, as if further demonstration that bringing broomsticks to a broomstick-demanding, witch-burning Luddite were necessary.
Abiogenesis is a separate topic from how life evolved after it got started. Needs different mechanisms, that kind of thing. It may never be possible to know we've recreated the actual historical scenario, as there may be more than one possible. And if science created life from scratch next week, that would be trumpeted as "proof of ID." The Catch-22 there being that what isn't reproducible in humanly engineered lab experiments isn't science at all and what IS is ID. Tah-Dah!
And, of course, you don't really want to know anything about abiogenesis research. You don't want to know anything about anything in the non-magical real world.