Brain working a little slowly this morning, I actually considered it might be worthwhile to drag in some papers on abiogenesis, as if further demonstration that bringing broomsticks to a broomstick-demanding, witch-burning Luddite were necessary.
Abiogenesis is a separate topic from how life evolved after it got started. Needs different mechanisms, that kind of thing. It may never be possible to know we've recreated the actual historical scenario, as there may be more than one possible. And if science created life from scratch next week, that would be trumpeted as "proof of ID." The Catch-22 there being that what isn't reproducible in humanly engineered lab experiments isn't science at all and what IS is ID. Tah-Dah!
And, of course, you don't really want to know anything about abiogenesis research. You don't want to know anything about anything in the non-magical real world.
Brain WAS working a little slowly. "... Demonstration that bringing boomsticks etc. etc." HAS NO EFFECT.
What abiogenesis research has shown is that life cannot come from non-life.
Even under ideal conditions, man cannot produce life from non-life.
That means (drumroll please) evolution could not have happened.
But that won't stop the evolutionists from pretending that life can évolve'from non-life, but that is all self-delusion to avoid dealing with their very real Creator.
Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools