[VadeRetro]

No, what you mean is that the data you are interpreting is based on a evolution paradigm, a paradigm which you have not even established as being possible.

You would seem to be trumpeting a science that knows nothing, nothing, nothing and can never learn anything.

1. Variation including mutation within species exists. We know this.
2. Some variations work better than others and preferentially thrive and reproduce. We can see this and it would make sense at any rate.
3. So populations figure to change over time if there are pressures from the environment to do so.

Where are the improbable elements that need to be demonstrated? Here's a clue. Your RELIGIOUS HORROR is not science.

The only liars are the evolutionists who are so intent to deny God's word that they will conjure up a fantasy that man came from rocks.

No. That's your version. Man from dirt in one afternoon. You don't know yours from ours. You are giving pig-ignorance a bad name.

[fortheDeclaration]

Oh, I know science knows some things.

And it knows the law that all life must come from life as well.(biogenesis)

[fortheDeclaration]

Nothing you listed had to do with Macro-evolution (species changing into another species)

No one questions adaptation within a species.

The only liars are the evolutionists who are so intent to deny God's word that they will conjure up a fantasy that man came from rocks. No. That's your version. Man from dirt in one afternoon. You don't know yours from ours. You are giving pig-ignorance a bad name.

And so where did life originate from liar for Lucifer?