[Diddle E. Squat]

Zero chance of winning, but he has a shot at electing the Democrat. No step forward and 1 step back doesn't advance the cause, but it lets the fools and cranks get a bitter thrill from spite.

[janetgreen]

Zero chance of winning

Don't be so sure of that. You have no idea how fed up Californians are with representatives who DON'T represent them. Gilchrist is a good guy who will put California's interests first.

[fr_freak]

Zero chance of winning, but he has a shot at electing the Democrat. No step forward and 1 step back doesn't advance the cause, but it lets the fools and cranks get a bitter thrill from spite.

This kind of attitude guarantees the status quo and, quite frankly, lacks guts. If the Republicans ignore this issue and end up losing an election they otherwise would have won, then they just might be forced to get their act together for the next election, whereas if we keep re-electing ineffectual or incompetent candidates because we are afraid to support someone who is not from the same mold as all other politicians who have failed us, then both parties can just keep pissing on us, because they know we'll just sit there and take it.

[PRND21]

Zero chance of winning, but he has a shot at electing the Democrat.

Fringers have deep pockets.
The FR Grifter Group is manning their battle notebooks once again.

[FlashBack]

I'll donate a few $$$ chances of winning to his campaign!