Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jaysun
How do we know that strong toes (in adults) were not a developmental variation instead of a genetic one?

Can similar shifts be seen in finger sizes?

Did we just keep the little ones (fingers) for digging bugs and various substances out of bodily orifices?

Why not just have bigger toes to retain heat during the ice ages, whereas smaller toes with less unit volume per unit of surface area would be more prone to freezing?

After the climate mediated, big, hairy toes would sweat more and smell bad, where delicate toes would be less prone to getting funky and driving Og-ette out of the cave.

Thus, a shift in mating habits brought about by foot odor....

12 posted on 08/25/2005 12:10:50 AM PDT by Smokin' Joe (God save us from the fury of the do-gooders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe
Thus, a shift in mating habits brought about by foot odor....

I though cave chicks preferred noxious smelling feet?
15 posted on 08/25/2005 12:42:57 AM PDT by Jaysun (Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Smokin' Joe

Feet without shoes don't get that funky foot smell.


16 posted on 08/25/2005 12:44:41 AM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson