Posted on 08/24/2005 6:39:35 PM PDT by wjersey
SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge here said environmental groups and four U.S. cities can sue federal development agencies on allegations the overseas projects they financially back contribute to global warming.
The decision Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White is the first to say that groups alleging global warming have a right to sue.
"This is the first decision in the country to say that climate change causes sufficient injury to give a plaintiff standing, to open the courthouse door," said Ronald Shems, a Vermont attorney representing Friends of the Earth.
That group, in addition to Greenpeace and the cities of Boulder, Colo., Santa Monica, Oakland and Arcata, Calif., sued Overseas Private Investment Corp. and the Export-Import Bank of the United States. Those government agencies provide loans and insure billions of dollars of U.S. investors' money for development projects overseas. Many of the projects are power plants that emit greenhouses gases that the groups allege cause global warming.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Important Legal Notice:
LAT/WP vs Free Republic Settles
Free Republic has settled the alleged copyright infringement suit brought by The Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post and has agreed not to post full text articles from their publications or any of their related subsidiaries and affiliates. Please do not post full text from these sources.
Any full text articles from LAT or WP or subsidiaries or affiliates will be deleted in compliance with this settlement. Click to see a copy of the Amended Final Judgment in this case.
Wow - it's Crichton's "State of Fear". Great book - his plot is very similar to this story.
I can't wait until they sue a volcano!
Mark
First they'd have to prove Global Warming.
They should stick to making sandals and syrup in Vermont and leave science to scientists instead of the Tort punks.
One more "judge" that needs immediate impeachment. do not pass go - do not collect 200 rubles.
To hell with them if our politicians and other so-called representatives don't do their jobs and trash these POS lawyer scums.
Oh - I forgot - most of them are lawyers themselves - that's why they refuse.
Or the Sun.... for fluctuating output.
Is there just no stopping these MORONS ?????
Sure there is- But someone will object to my using them for target practice.....DARN......
The decision is pretty narrow. It was about standing, not the merits, or whether a cause of action was stated. The latter issue comes next. Just what the basis is for the standing is not stated in the article.
Is there just no stopping these MORONS ?????
Sure there is- But someone will object to my using them for target practice.....DARN......
They should sue the source of the oil that causes most of the problem.
Short of a world court, I, too, am puzzled.
re: Global warming has never been proven.
Let the defendants take that position and place the burden of proof on the plaintiff. And then cross-examine the plaintiff and his witness. We ought to be able to destroy the Global Warming hoax once and for all with that.
By golly, you're right! Time to sue the dinosaurs!
Mark
I know that. :)
This story is off the AP news wire, however , and not a WP article , only an AP one posted on their site..
There are any number of sources that it can be pulled from and posted in its entirety.
Our judiciary is insane.
It's tar and feather time.
The topic over which to argue formally (i.e. w/a standard of proof) is specifically ''anthropogenic global warming'', that H. Sapiens is either the proximate or the most specific cause of such a phenomenon.
Not one freaking chance in hell of proving that little proposition in a court of law, even these days and even with 12 of the dumbest SOBs you can name sitting in the jury box. (Well, I suppose one should note that 12 stupid SOBs did acquit OJ...)
When science falls into the purview of courts instead of open-source peer review, we're screwed. It would seem that we're well on the way to that sorry end, sadly.
Federal Judge OKs Global Warming LawsuitBy DAVID KRAVETS
Associated Press WriterSAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Environmental groups and four U.S. cities can sue federal development agencies on allegations the overseas projects they back financially contribute to global warming, a judge has ruled.
A coalition of environmental groups sued two government agencies that provide loans and insure billions of dollars of U.S. investors' money for development projects overseas. Many are power plants that emit greenhouses gases such as carbon dioxide that are believed to be a leading cause of global warming.
"This is the first decision in the country to say that climate change causes sufficient injury to give a plaintiff standing, to open the courthouse door," said Ronald Shems, a Vermont attorney representing Friends of the Earth.
That group, in addition to Greenpeace, Boulder, Colo., and the California cities of Oakland, Santa Monica and Arcata, sued the government agencies.
They argued that the National Environmental Policy Act, the law requiring environmental assessments of proposed projects in the United States, should apply to the U.S.-backed projects overseas because they contribute to the degradation of the U.S. environment.
The agencies, known as the Overseas Private Investment Corp. and the Export-Import Bank of the United States, claimed that U.S. environmental regulations do not apply to overseas projects, and that the courts have no right to intervene.
Still, the ruling Tuesday by U.S. District Judge Jeffrey White was narrow. He did not rule whether the federal agencies must perform environmental assessments of projects they help fund, but simply said the environmental groups have a right to sue.
If White's decision stands, the issue of whether U.S. environmental rules apply to the projects backed by the agencies likely will be litigated, Shems said.
Linda Formella, a spokeswoman with Export-Import Bank, said the agency does not comment on pending cases. The Overseas Private Investment Corp. did not immediately return calls seeking comment.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.