I thought you said it was taken out of context you DING BAT! Make up your mind!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
To: areafiftyone
Couldn't it have been BOTH??
To: areafiftyone
Does this mean I can't join Pat Robertson's Remington 700 Club?
4 posted on
08/24/2005 1:33:05 PM PDT by
dblshot
To: areafiftyone
Did he cry? I always enjoy it when those phony ba$tard$ ry.
7 posted on
08/24/2005 1:34:13 PM PDT by
68 grunt
(3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
To: areafiftyone
Why post this??? Who cares? Why perpetuate the hysteria being created by the left? Pat Robertson made a stupid statement. Big deal.
8 posted on
08/24/2005 1:34:17 PM PDT by
pgkdan
To: areafiftyone
9 posted on
08/24/2005 1:34:23 PM PDT by
NormB
(Yes, but watch your cookies!!)
To: areafiftyone
He's past his prime. And his prime, such as it was, was never ready for prime time.
10 posted on
08/24/2005 1:34:37 PM PDT by
Prince Caspian
(Don't ask if it's risky... Ask if the reward is worth the risk)
To: areafiftyone
I defended his right to say it. Hugo Chavez is one dangerous SOB.
Guess Robertson's conscience got the best of him.
11 posted on
08/24/2005 1:35:06 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
To: areafiftyone
15 posted on
08/24/2005 1:36:20 PM PDT by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: areafiftyone
"I never said it. People twisted my words. And I apologize for saying it."
What a dope!
To: areafiftyone
It seems like it's been a long time since Pat Robertson was relevant.
For me, the defining moment was around 8 or 10 years ago when his CBN endorsed Benny Hinn.
20 posted on
08/24/2005 1:37:31 PM PDT by
newgeezer
(Just my opinion, of course. Your mileage may vary.)
To: areafiftyone
Yes, this is clearly much better:
I didn't say 'assassination.' I said our special forces should 'take him out.' And 'take him out' can be a number of things, including kidnapping
Pat, you said what you meant. Be a man. Stick by it.
23 posted on
08/24/2005 1:39:10 PM PDT by
Personal Responsibility
(Register to vote as a Dem! You get to vote in their primaries and it screws up their polling data!)
To: areafiftyone
It might not have been a great idea to call for killing him. But Hugo Chavez is a serious threat to U.S. security and action in our defense may have to be done.
24 posted on
08/24/2005 1:39:52 PM PDT by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: areafiftyone
Here is the GREAT part: If a stooog in Hugos Vensela Said : "I think ChaaaaVez should kill Bush", the guy would be loved around the world.
To: areafiftyone
I'm still waiting for the same outrage from the media when StepOnAllOfUs, working in the Clinton administration, called for the assassination of Saddam.
To: areafiftyone
Very very clever.
Was it right to have MADE A STATEMENT ABOUT ASSASSINATION? ("well of course, NO").
IS ASSASSINATION still an option? (no comment). Very clever. Clever indeed.
27 posted on
08/24/2005 1:40:43 PM PDT by
AmericanInTokyo
(**AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT IS NOT SO MUCH "WHO" WE STAND FOR, BUT RATHER "WHAT" WE STAND FOR**)
To: areafiftyone
Robertson apologizes *Shakes head in disgust* Great, this will do nothing but embolden Chavez and the Left even more. Robertson should have either stood by his statement or not made it in the first place.
36 posted on
08/24/2005 1:42:36 PM PDT by
evets
(God bless president Bush!)
To: areafiftyone
Why is this even news? Who gives a rat's rear end?
39 posted on
08/24/2005 1:43:00 PM PDT by
Skooz
("Political Correctness is the handmaiden of terrorism" - Michelle Malkin)
To: areafiftyone
Well I for one, do not want to see him on the Supreme Court then!
Oh, Robertson! not Roberts....
44 posted on
08/24/2005 1:47:55 PM PDT by
RushCrush
(The mediocre always throw stones at the brilliant.)
To: areafiftyone
49 posted on
08/24/2005 1:51:11 PM PDT by
Thrusher
(Remember the Mog.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-35 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
