Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Expert Predicts Apocalypse, But Few are Listening
Newhouse News Service ^ | August 20, 2005 | Alexander Lane

Posted on 08/24/2005 6:06:17 AM PDT by minerboy

hink high gas prices are bad?

Get a load of what ex-oilman and ex-Princeton professor Kenneth Deffeyes believes are following closely behind:

"War, famine, pestilence and death," he said. "We've got to get the warning out."

The threat? Peak oil.

The term refers to the time when the worldwide production of oil peaks and begins a rapid decline. From then on, this incredibly efficient fuel source, which still costs less than most bottled water, will be ever more scarce and ever more costly.

Highly respected sources, including the U.S. government, think that day is distant, and most mainstream economists think it won't cause much of a ruckus.

But Deffeyes thinks peak oil is coming in November, and could bring humankind to the brink.

"It's been like pulling teeth to get public awareness," he said.

So who is this well-credentialed Chicken Little?

Deffeyes grew up next to gushing oil wells. He is a former petroleum geologist himself, having worked for Shell Oil for six years after earning a doctorate from Princeton.

He is a devotee of former Shell geologist M. King Hubbert, who correctly predicted U.S. oil production would peak in the early 1970s. Deffeyes is also the author of "Hubbert's Peak" and "Beyond Oil: The View From Hubbert's Peak," which was published last spring.

He is among a cadre of peak-oil proponents who sketch out a frightening near-term future in which the American way of life is upended as the United States, China and great nations scramble after oil fields like desperate players in a game of musical chairs.

(Excerpt) Read more at statesman.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: doomsdayagain; energy; oil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-182 next last
To: minerboy

Perhaps my sons Honda Metropolitan Scooter which he never rides, won't sell and I have to move everytime I need to get the mower out will come in handy - after the sky falls of course.


101 posted on 08/24/2005 8:18:20 AM PDT by IamConservative (The true character of a man is revealed in what he does when no one is looking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Tom Gold was a plagerist who didn't even get the facts straight.


102 posted on 08/24/2005 8:19:13 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: kjam22

Oh yes, a drill rig worker knows all, I forgot... I only design the equipment, I know nothing at all.


103 posted on 08/24/2005 8:26:28 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; wtc911
Proposing shale development for fuel is not much help. In fact, with the pressure building daily on high oil prices it is in some ways delusional. Of course, if we begin today, we might be able to develop shale for fuel in only ten years! We do not even have the refineries to supply gasoline to the U.S. In the western states, we are importing gasoline from Mexico! How stupid is that, I ask you? Standard Oil-Chevron-Texaco-BP-Unocal has a virtual monopoly on fuel production in the U.S. That gigantic conglomerate decides not to upgrade refineries and/or to build new refineries; the result is that America suffers? Oil is a vital strategic resource. What do we get? Profiteering, speculation, pure greed and higher prices!

Time to smell the coffee. wtc911 is correct. Peak oil is already here. Not because of a shortage of oil field production. But because of global politics and the factors I outlined in post # 58.

104 posted on 08/24/2005 8:28:12 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: RipSawyer
More like the seventies, the VW Rabbit diesel was reported to do about fifty one miles to the gallon in highway driving.

One of my brothers had a late 70's diesel chevette that got 48mpg.

105 posted on 08/24/2005 8:29:35 AM PDT by painter (We celebrate liberty which comes from God not from government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Doohickey

Well, I just diagree with the Gas/Electric for fuel economy solution for the passenger vehicle... The general production level fuel economy doesn't beat TDI technology, but adds thousands of dollars to costs, and not to mention the "eco" issues with the batteries etc.

If a straight diesel engine, 4 cylinders using TDI can get 50 MPG or higher without the aid of being a hybrid, why would arguing a standard Gasoline engine, tied to electric hybrid accomplishing the same output is a better solution?

It just makes no sense, added materials, costs, complexity, and still do not beat technology that has been around since the 70s in terms of fuel efficiency, and since the mid 90s in terms of eco friendliness.

I had a 1991 VW Fox, little in line 4 banger, standard gas engine, tied to a 5 speed manual transmission and I could get about 40-45 MPG on the highway. It was size wise comparable interior to the subcompact hybrids 4 adults comfortably, didn't have all the added cost and complication.

I am not saying a GAS/ELECTRIC hybrid may not be one day a better solution.. IE 1 cylinder moped engine, generating enough electricity to drive a typical car at normal speeds... but the stuff out there right now, just isn't beating existing standard solutions that are far less complicated. Tax subsidies and CAFE credits are behind the hybrid fad, as far as I can tell, not practical fuel economics.


106 posted on 08/24/2005 8:36:33 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Bear_Slayer; nuconvert
I saw this doomsday hysteria on the front page of one of those ridiculous 'rags' at the supermarket. I think it was the same paper that showed a picture a few months ago of cats living on Venus. LoL

Wasn't it one of those 'rags' that broke the Clinton/Lewinski story?

I saw the cover as well last week at a supermarket. It's not "The National Enquirer" which is what you are thinking of, Bear. Believe it or not, this tabloid is actually several steps below the "The Enquirer" when it comes to credibility (the name escapes me, "News of the World"?).

This tabloid has had some hilarious stories over the years. They had a "photo" of Rush meeting with space aliens to receive their endorsement for a presidential run. They had a cover story about Bill'n'Hill adopting an alien baby. Their recent "oil" story had a fake photo of desperate mobs around oil derricks. A real hoot.

107 posted on 08/24/2005 8:37:33 AM PDT by Martin Tell (Red States [should act like they] Rule)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: painter

I'm driving a Toyota diesel myself. It averages 38 mpg and gets over 43 mpg on the highway. The problem for me is that with increasing demand by truckers, diesel fuel has gone up about $ 1.25 + a gallon in the past year.


108 posted on 08/24/2005 8:43:20 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
There is no biblical reason to think they weren't created during the 6 days

There is no biblical reason to say they are. It simply isn't there.

109 posted on 08/24/2005 8:47:09 AM PDT by Citizen of the Savage Nation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
Too many Freepers think that any concern about oil supply and the need to develop alternate energy sources is tree-hugging nonsense.

-----------------------------------------

"tree-hugging nonsense"...perfectly put.

110 posted on 08/24/2005 8:47:51 AM PDT by wtc911 (see my profile for how to contribute to a pentagon heroes fund)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
Sir you have not read, for one thing those 6 days are not 6 of what we commonly refer to as 24 hour days. Peter says they are not.

Peter never said those 6 days are not 24 hr days.

111 posted on 08/24/2005 8:58:34 AM PDT by biblewonk (A house of cards built on Matt 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross; ex-Texan
"Oil-producing companies and countries publish estimates of their proven reserves -- essentially, the amount of oil they can pump with existing technology under current market conditions. It all adds up to about 1.3 trillion barrels worldwide, enough to keep humanity's cars, factories and power plants humming for 42 years at our present level of consumption."

-----------------------------------------------

Problems with this....

1)technology has not yet found a way to extract more than roughly half of the oil in any field so reduce your expectation to 21 years.

2)Our level of consumption is accelerating at a rate exponentially faster than the annual increase in production, which will further reduce your specutated time-frame.

112 posted on 08/24/2005 8:59:49 AM PDT by wtc911 (see my profile for how to contribute to a pentagon heroes fund)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
This earth is the evidence of what is Written and they do not conflict. The earth is a very very OLD place. Man causes the conflict by ignoring what is actually Written.

It is not written that the Earth is 5 billion years old. The bible gived the Chronology of creation from Adam to Jesus and Adam was created on the 6th day of creation. 5 days after the 1st day.

113 posted on 08/24/2005 9:00:19 AM PDT by biblewonk (A house of cards built on Matt 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell
Believe it or not, this tabloid is actually several steps below the "The Enquirer" when it comes to credibility (the name escapes me, "News of the World"?).

You're probably thinking of Weekly World News. Always good for a laugh.

114 posted on 08/24/2005 9:00:40 AM PDT by Buggman (Baruch ata Adonai Elohanu, Mehlech ha Olam, asher nathan lanu et derech ha y’shua b’Mashiach Yeshua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Citizen of the Savage Nation
There is no biblical reason to say they are. It simply isn't there.

Yes it is since there was nothing that could support life before the first day.

115 posted on 08/24/2005 9:02:50 AM PDT by biblewonk (A house of cards built on Matt 16:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: minerboy
It's not just peak oil panic-speak that's feeding the price increase frenzy.

Subject: Oil and Gas Rise as Storm May Threaten U.S. Rigs in Gulf of Mexico

Description: Crude oil rose and natural gas reached $10 for the first time in 30 months in New York due to concern over a storm developing near the Bahamas which may become a hurricane and threaten rigs in the Gulf of Mexico, the biggest source of U.S. production. Oil for October delivery climbed 58 cents, to $66.29 a barrel on the Nymex. Natural gas for September delivery gained as much as 44.5 cents, to $10.128 per million British thermal units on the Nymex.

Out of the 10 named storms this season, seven have entered the Gulf of Mexico and four disrupted oil supplies. According to the National Hurricane Center in Miami, the 12th tropical depression of the season will probably make a path toward Southern Florida and then strengthen into a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico. “Significant hurricane damage to oil fields and refineries could make us test $70 a barrel,” said Kevin Norrish, and analyst at Barclays.

There have been other disruptions as well due to unrest in Iraq, Ecuador and Nigeria, and disruptions make the market nervous. Surging global oil demand has forced OPEC, who produces about 40% of the world’s oil, to pump crude almost at capacity which has left them with little margin to compensate for disruptions to supply. But, according to a Bloomberg survey, record prices are doing little to curtail demand.

Sanford Bernstein analysts said that U.S. natural gas may rise to $12 or $15 per million British thermal units this winter, should crude oil rise to $80 or $90 a barrel.

Source: Bloomberg (24-Aug-05)

116 posted on 08/24/2005 9:13:54 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (Pray fervently for Israel in these biblically historic times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
Proposing shale development for fuel is not much help. In fact, with the pressure building daily on high oil prices it is in some ways delusional.

B'zzzt. Wrong. 1 trillion barrels. All for $10 per barrel. H'mmmmm.

As the playwrite noted in Macbeth, "I think the lady doth protest too much."

I do think there is some countervailing interests preventing exploitation of these fields. And you have put your finger solely on "Big Oil" I see. Perhaps.

But there are a number of others. Big Eco-Wackoism is another. And also the possible ulterior foreign agenda of the administration to try and diminish the financial leverage of the Arabs by draining their oil supply to marginal insignificance. But that surely can't be accomplished in the near term, and is a long-term project. Nor is it without the shortterm hazard of accomplishing the reverse effect...driving up their oil revenues by the supply-demand process to the point where they are becoming a bigger problem in the immediate future...not a lesser.

117 posted on 08/24/2005 9:24:46 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk

"It is not written that the Earth is 5 billion years old."

That is correct we are not given the AGE of this earth, yet we are told it is ancient and very old.

"The bible gived the Chronology of creation from Adam to Jesus and Adam was created on the 6th day of creation. 5 days after the 1st day."

We are told about "GENERATIONS" before The Adam was ever created.

Then after The Adam was created we are given his generations. NOT ONE WORD IS GIVEN about the age of the earth. Now why didn't Noah save any of these creatures???? Why, they were not here to be saved.


118 posted on 08/24/2005 10:26:10 AM PDT by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: ex-Texan
We do not even have the refineries to supply gasoline to the U.S.

That is primarily due to Eco-Wackoism, from what I understand. Simple economics perverted by the externality of environmental litigatory/legislative obstructionists.

119 posted on 08/24/2005 10:26:24 AM PDT by Paul Ross (Definition of strict constructionist: someone who DOESN'T hallucinate when reading the Constitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Paul Ross

Wake up, Paul! You are never going to see shale developed for fuel. Never. It is not going to happen. Well, not for at least 20 years. Then add another 10 years on for start up time. Unless you can bribe Standard Oil-Chevron-Texico-BP-Unocal to do it. Do you have the cash for the BIG bribe? I think not. Bush does not give a r@t's@ass about high oil prices either. Both political parties are in the pockets of big oil. So you can shout from the roof tops all day long. Scream louder if you want to. Your efforts are all for naught. It's never going to happen.
You heard it here first.


120 posted on 08/24/2005 10:31:00 AM PDT by ex-Texan (Mathew 7:1 through 6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson