Skip to comments.
Bush Answers Critics of Iraq War! (Bush fights back!)
AP
| 8/23/05
Posted on 08/23/2005 8:18:15 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-257 next last
To: RetiredArmy
I am listening to Rush but have on Defense Dept briefing.
The news alert under Rummy is claiming that the commission was informed about ABLE DANGER.
141
posted on
08/23/2005 10:40:12 AM PDT
by
mware
(Trollhunter of Note)
To: Admin Moderator
To: ohioWfan
However, the 'this problem' involves Jordanian, Iranian, Syrian and Saudi terrorists as well. Once we leave, they can send militias out to patrol the border. Though, we can't even secure our own border. What makes you think we will EVER be able to secure Iraq's border?
143
posted on
08/23/2005 10:40:59 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: Shazolene
FYI, The Fox site has taken down the AP story on this and replaced it with its own, and the Fox story includes references to the 2004 meeting.
'Looks like Fox reads Freeper writings!
A.P.
144
posted on
08/23/2005 10:41:06 AM PDT
by
bowlalpo
(How-bout Articles-of-Impeachment for: Durbin, Waters, Biden, Boxer, Kennedy, Byrd, Pelosi, Reid...)
To: SoFloFreeper
indication that he would change his mind and meet with Sheehan
Notice also how the AP still refuse to address the fact that it would be a SECOND meeting or that Democrat Party Front Group, Moveon.org, hired PR Giant Freen Communications to stage manage Sheehan's "protest" But that is ok, the more they talk, the more they remind people why the Hysteric Left cannot be trusted with ANY measure of political power
145
posted on
08/23/2005 10:43:56 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you try to be smarter, I will try to be nicer.)
To: SoFloFreeper
indication that he would change his mind and meet with Sheehan
Notice also how the AP still refuse to address the fact that it would be a SECOND meeting or that Democrat Party Front Group, Moveon.org, hired PR Giant Freen Communications to stage manage Sheehan's "protest" But that is ok, the more they talk, the more they remind people why the Hysteric Left cannot be trusted with ANY measure of political power
146
posted on
08/23/2005 10:44:01 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you try to be smarter, I will try to be nicer.)
To: ohioWfan
Do you think that a pullout from this war is a good idea? It's funny what people are able to accomplish when they have no other alternative. Why do you think that Iraq, if it's truly interested in a peaceful democracy as we were told they were before the invasion, can't solve their own problems? It wouldn't be a pullout or a retreat. We have liberated Iraq from Saddam Hussein. Mission accomplished.
147
posted on
08/23/2005 10:44:13 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: greed1sin
ALERT!
148
posted on
08/23/2005 10:44:27 AM PDT
by
Fudd Fan
(God bless President Bush)
To: mware
Like anything that is damning to Clinton, it will be ignored by the communist MSM and denied by the socialist democrats.
149
posted on
08/23/2005 10:44:27 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(The Imperial Federal Government is your worst enemy! Don't give in to them!)
To: johnb838; GraniteStateConservative
We have gained a dishonorable reputation in the world of bugging out, leaving our allies in the lurch, not fulfilling obligations we've made, and leaving people to the tender mercies of their enemies. The President knows this. Exactly. And it is exactly this that weakens America, undermines our aims, and discourages those that would support or ally with us. Of course this is what the left wants: a weak and marginalized America.
That was their goal, and what they managed to accomplish, in Vietnam. They lied then (as they are lying now) about only wanting to "bring the troops home." Instead, when they controlled congress, and after the troops were brought home, and a peace concluded (by a Republican president), they slashed aid to South Vietnam and our other allies in Indochina again and again, expended every ounce of political capital toward preventing enforcement of the peace accords, and took every opportunity to undermine, delegitimize and dispirit them. They did all of this gratuitously and proudly, and most horrifying they are still proud of it to this very day.
They must never hold power again.
150
posted on
08/23/2005 10:45:47 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Admin Moderator
Halliburton just paid me $100,000 to ban you.
I'll call up Dick and have the Big Oil cartel send you another $100,000 for a bonus on a job so well done. :-}
151
posted on
08/23/2005 10:46:34 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you try to be smarter, I will try to be nicer.)
To: RetiredArmy
Retired, the line has been drawn. Rummy says the Pentagon informed the commission.
Someone is a liar and I don't think it is Rummy.
152
posted on
08/23/2005 10:47:16 AM PDT
by
mware
(Trollhunter of Note)
To: Stultis
They must never hold power again. For your mouth to Gods ears.
153
posted on
08/23/2005 10:47:30 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you try to be smarter, I will try to be nicer.)
To: auntyfemenist
When did "pullout" come to substitute for the words retreat and defeat anyway? You're the one suggesting they are synonyms. A pullout just means to leave. We liberated Iraq. That was our mission (or one of them, the one we could pull off) and so it's perfectly reasonable to leave a field of battle after the mission is accomplished.
154
posted on
08/23/2005 10:47:59 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: fr_freak
God Bless Our Troops
155
posted on
08/23/2005 10:49:25 AM PDT
by
Earthdweller
(Earth to liberals, we were not in Iraq on 9/11 so how did the war cause terrorism again?)
To: weegee
I would take your idea one step further. I can't remember the last time I dropped 50 cents for one of my local rags. I gave up my subscription at least 5 to 6 years ago when I got sick of the left rhetoric. I do noticed that most the hotel chains have a free paper for you in the morning by your door. A lot of the time a USA today. Then I thought about it. I'm willing to bet that at least a third or maybe even half of the MSM's papers subscriptions are corporate type subscriptions that these companies buy to provide their customers for reading. Waiting rooms, hotel chains, etc. The fact may be they have even less dedicated subscribers then they think. Just because a major hotel chain provides daily editions of your paper doesn't mean you actually have a popular product. When I get my USA Today when traveling I just leave it on the floor and walk on it as I'm walking out the door. That's about all it's worth. The Internet is the new mass media. I can read several articles on one topic from various sources and make my own opinion.
156
posted on
08/23/2005 10:49:34 AM PDT
by
rip033
(.)
To: oceanview
we've already won the part of the war that our forces were designed to win. the administration never updated its message, its just a constant mantra of "stay the course". the public message needs to be much broader then that. Right. No reason we can't declare victory and leave, except that Bush has painted us into a corner regarding the definition of success being a shining city on a hill in the Middle East. He's allowed the terms of victory to get ridiculously out of hand.
157
posted on
08/23/2005 10:51:46 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Once we leave, they can send militias out to patrol the border.
In which case the terrorists have no need to attack in Iraq. They get to Run around the madrassas screaming "We defeated the Americans join us in Jihad" and recruit the next generation of "Holy Warriors" to plan the next series of 9-11 style attacks. We need to draw the "Holy Warriors" out of hiding into a kill zone where their weakness (Convectional military power) is projected up against our strength (firepower, firepower, firepower). Iraq is about taking and maintaining the initiative in the War on Islamic Terror. Iraq is what Sze Tse called "Death Ground" a battle field the terrorists MUST fight on for political reasons. We cannot defend everything, appease or isolate ourselves from these people. I thought after 9-11 even the most cast iron conservative would realize that! Isolationism has NEVER worked. We must fight these people! Iraq is the IDEAL place to do it.
158
posted on
08/23/2005 10:54:49 AM PDT
by
MNJohnnie
(If you try to be smarter, I will try to be nicer.)
To: mware
159
posted on
08/23/2005 10:55:31 AM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(The Imperial Federal Government is your worst enemy! Don't give in to them!)
To: Getsmart64
It's pretty obvious you don't know very much about the M.E. Before you are allowed to pose that question...you have to answer the question on how 20% of the country imposed it's will on the other 80% of the country for damn near 50 years.... We wouldn't be leaving them in the arms of a military thug. There's clearly the makings of a government there. We can provide them with all the guns and ammo they could possibly need to hold off a threat from another military thug. That doesn't require any personnel, just equipment. We can even send groups of Iraqis to Europe for training, if you like.
160
posted on
08/23/2005 10:56:32 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 241-257 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson