Posted on 08/22/2005 5:25:20 PM PDT by finnman69
Krugman is a liar, the Pope is Catholic, and bears really do defecate in the woods. It's always nice to see more proof, though.
Oh, that big lie, it's hard to keep up.
i have posted before about paulie an economist that is highly regarded by the left who has had one correct economic prediction in his last hundred or so, afellow freeper pinged me back success=failure to the left
that sums up paulie perfectly
Krugman ping.
I don't see how you can say big LIE, as though there were only one.
bbttt
The new Paul Krugman website
If someone reading this site wants to get in touch with me for radio, TV, karaoke, whatever, I run such things through Monteiro and Company: 212-832-8183, bmonteiro at monteiroandco.com. Speaking engagements should go through the Leigh lecture bureau, 908-253-8600 (note that New York Times rules severely limit the kinds of engagements I can accept, and my committment to finishing the textbook - see below - rules out any bookings in the near future).
Also: my new book, The Great Unraveling, will be published on Sept. 15. I will be doing a number of promotional appearances around the country in Sept. and October; please contact Monteiro and Company for information.
Coming attraction: No, not Attack of the Clones. Krugman/Wells, the principles textbook, is moving closer to physical reality - sufficiently so that the publisher has established a website . This, by the way, is how I spend most of my time these days. A "beta" version of the micro split will be available in spring 2004.
If you are for some reason really really interested in yours truly, or, better, in what I've actually said and done, check out the unofficial Paul Krugman web page . I disavow any knowledge of its contents.
1. Current events
The smear machine cranks up again (10/24/03)
You like me! You really like me! (9/20/03)
Book tour info - so far (9/2/03)
More on California taxes (8/28/03)
First Review (8/26/03)
State Tax Burdens (8/26/03)
Heat casualties (8/13/03)
The Minister of Body-Building (8/9/03)
Social Security and Medicare, once again (8/9/03) Updated
There they go again (8/9/03) (updated)
In praise of Alan Abelson (8/3/03)
Argentina: the role of ideology (8/3/03)
Social Security (8/2/03)
Economic hyperbole (8/1/03)
Vacationing with the enemy (7/22/03)
It's true! I did it! (7/22/03)
From the horse's mouth (6/10/03)
The new book (6/2/03)
Fiscal facts (5/28/03)
In plain sight (5/11/03)
Serfs up! (5/8/03)
Tax cuts and jobs: a summary of the debate (5/8/03)
Deflation? Not exactly (5/7/03)
Special: Bobby Pelgrift's take on the "jobs, jobs, jobs" argument ("argument" as in the Monty Python sketch, but still ...)
Elephant shit (5/5/03)
Zero is not enough (5/4/03)
Even more about jobs (4/29/03)
Fiscal policy and employment (4/28/03)
Jobs, jobs, jobs: a followup (4/24/03)
Nothing for Money (3/14/03)
Backyard Darwinism (3/8/03)
Oh, deer (2/18/03)
Long and variable lags (2/18/03)
Paging Dorothy Parker (2/5/03)
When the end justifies the medians (2/4/03)
Polls for dummies (1/31/03)
Mutability of history (1/30/03)
Your Questions Answered (1/10/03)
Ferdinand Marcos (1/8/03)
Soaking the rich? (12/18/02)
Vintage 1948 (12/11/02)
Why Mickey can't read (12/9/02)
Dept. of self-congratulation, part deux (12/7/02)
Dept. of self-congratulation (12/6/02)
Grassley digs his hole deeper (10/25/02)
Fat right tails (10/20/02)
Sources for the NYT magazine piece (10/18/02)
Jobs, jobs, jobs (10/10/02)
A small correction (8/29/02)
Not on the web (8/27/02)
How the surplus was lost (8/26/02)
Bush's budget blues (8/21/02)
Some deflation thoughts (8/17/02)
The liberal New York Times (8/6/02)
Power and the Rangers (8/4/02)
A quibble with Steve Roach (8/2/02)
Remembering Rudi Dornbusch (7/28/02)
Get Rubin (7/27/02)
Rudi Dornbusch (7/26/02)
The rhinoceros effect (7/21/02)
On being partisan
A left-wing conspirator at work
A quick note on oil
You know you've made it when ...
Hastert's expansive middle
Notes on depreciation, the yen, and the argentino
Argentina: Money monomania
2. Analytical pieces
New Frank thoughts on the California crisis
New Red versus blue in theory
Japan: still trapped (November 1998 - looks pretty good right now)
Analytical afterthoughts on the Asian crisis
There's something about macro
Was it all in Ohlin?
Thinking about the liquidity trap
But for, as if, and so what
The fall and rise of development economics
3. General writings
The ice age cometh (Fortune, May 1998 - looks pretty good now)
Why Germany kant kompete
Supply, demand, and English food
Notes on Social Security
Some chaotic thoughts on regional dynamics
O Canada (about Mundell's Nobel Prize)
4. Personal statements
How I work (1993)
Incidents from my career (1995)
Enron FAQs
5. Course material
Six theories of international trade (figure)
Gains from trade and comparative advantage
Heckscher-Ohlin diagrams
The technology gap Ricardian model
"The Krugman Truth Squad is everywhere."
Yes, Krugman is another in a long line of MSM obfuscs.
Blair
Duranty
Maybe he'll get a Pulitzer!
This man cannot be trusted. Watch him sometime and he cannot look anyone in the eye for more than a second or two. This is a sign of someone who is not telling the truth.
Krugman looks and acts like the weasel he is.
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
Krugman charges that in Florida in 2000, the state's Republican Party apparatus denied the right to vote to some citizens by falsely accusing them of being felons (in Florida, felons are not allowed to vote).
I wouldn't pay attention to another leftist loon and Rat enabler whose only objective is making sure the Rats win at any cost, and if not... just make it up.
From the NYT and Paul Krugman, it's routine.
I take it you're not a Krugman fan, eh? ;-)
I checked out a site with a bunch of those emoticons and I couldn't figure out which ones were the most hilarious.
Another site, or the same one I'm using? They're very funny. Some are just too much to even post them, lol.
So in 2000 Bush was selected not elected. So what? It was a tie and it got resolved. Rather the Supreme Court of the US do the selecting than the shysters in Floiduh.
In 2004 Gore was not the candidate. If he should have won 2000 then why didn't they run him again in 2004?
Bush kicked sKerry's but soundly in 2004 and it would seem to me this is much more relevant than what did or did not happen in 2000.
It's the one you're using. The ones where a smiley-face gets an anxious look and then barfs are hilarious -- I think they're perfect for a Krugman thread like this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.