To: Know your rights
"I was accurately applying YOUR criterion; if you don't like the conclusion, YOU need to rethink your argument."
I respectfully disagree, my previous reply stands.
17 posted on
08/22/2005 6:57:15 PM PDT by
7thOF7th
(Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
To: 7thOF7th
Your previous reply is, with all due respect, horse manure. YOU said "The Substance was the impetus for the act," a criterion that most certainly applies to jewelry store robberies.
18 posted on
08/22/2005 7:00:09 PM PDT by
Know your rights
(The modern enlightened liberal doesn't care what you believe as long as you don't really believe it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson