You really don't have any clue.
You don't approve of the translations, so they're "messed up"
You ask for sources.
When I post them, you claim most muslims muslims don't follow them. When I prove they do, you ask for quranic sources. When I post them, you claim they are misinterpreted....
You don't know the difference between secular law and islamic law and then go on to state that islamic law "isn't so bad".
When I point out what islamic law actually is, you claim its wrong.
Of course, your arguments have been based on your opinions, google searches and the encyclopedia.
In that case, it was just prejudicial language, really not changing the meaning.
You ask for sources. When I post them,
You have not yet posted something saying a woman cannot initiate divorce.
and then go on to state that islamic law "isn't so bad".
No, I state it isn't as bad as the ignorant out to villify the religion say it is. I do not believe it "isn't so bad."
Of course, your arguments have been based on your opinions, google searches and the encyclopedia.
... college courses in Islam (BTW, taught by a guy who was not sympathetic to Muslims), personally knowing Muslims, and, unlike you, actually having been to Muslim states where shari'a is law.
Meanwhile, your knowledge seems to be entirely from books written by hate-filled Christians who don't like the religious competition.