In that case, it was just prejudicial language, really not changing the meaning.
You ask for sources. When I post them,
You have not yet posted something saying a woman cannot initiate divorce.
and then go on to state that islamic law "isn't so bad".
No, I state it isn't as bad as the ignorant out to villify the religion say it is. I do not believe it "isn't so bad."
Of course, your arguments have been based on your opinions, google searches and the encyclopedia.
... college courses in Islam (BTW, taught by a guy who was not sympathetic to Muslims), personally knowing Muslims, and, unlike you, actually having been to Muslim states where shari'a is law.
Meanwhile, your knowledge seems to be entirely from books written by hate-filled Christians who don't like the religious competition.
Are you not aware that your comments and posts to and from myself and other posters can be and ARE referred to?
Your statement regarding sharia as not so bad... "No, I state it isn't as bad as the ignorant out to villify the religion say it is. I do not believe it "isn't so bad."
Then why did you state that you thought it "isn't so bad?"
You might want to re-read not only your original statement, but statements and comments from other posters as well...just to refresh your memory.
"You have not yet posted something saying a woman cannot initiate divorce."
Oh haven't I? I have...repeatedly.
You, antiRepublicrat, haven't supported any of your statements with ANY sources.
You state that your knowledge, (or lack thereof, as you've demonstrated), comes from "college courses in Islam (BTW, taught by a guy who was not sympathetic to Muslims), personally knowing Muslims, and, unlike you, actually having been to Muslim states where shari'a is law."
Yet you don't even know the difference between secular Turkey and sharia Saudi Arabia...
Now you, who knows me not, presume to know my faith, life experiences, travel ventures and friendships...
I don't recall sharing ANY of that information with you.
Why would you make such a stupid statement?
Apparently the following statement you made sums it all up very well:
"Meanwhile, your knowledge seems to be entirely from books written by hate-filled Christians who don't like the religious competition."
"hate-filled Christians who don't like the religious competition."
And there we see you clearly, don't we AntiRepublicrat? You're an ignorant, narrow-minded religious bigot.
Don't bother me any more...I have no use for hateful bigots.