BTW, nice to see you're now getting an education on the differences between schools of Islamic jurisprudence now that you know they exist. But knowing and realizing are two different things. You see there are multiple schools yet cannot see the obvious related fact: different schools means different implementations of shari'a.
No. She needs to ask permission, pay ransom, etc. The husband has no such limitations.
You're using some messed up translations. She has to give money back, and possibly a fine if she's pretty bad. Asking permission from the court is the same thing as initiating a divorce. Either she or the husband initiates, and the husband certainly isn't doing it if she's the one petitioning the court.
You keep saying that it isn't perfectly equal as if I'd said they are perfectly equal, and I never said that, only that you made it seem worse than it is in order to villify a religion you hate. Hate and ignorance always go hand in hand.
You really don't have any clue.
You don't approve of the translations, so they're "messed up"
You ask for sources.
When I post them, you claim most muslims muslims don't follow them. When I prove they do, you ask for quranic sources. When I post them, you claim they are misinterpreted....
You don't know the difference between secular law and islamic law and then go on to state that islamic law "isn't so bad".
When I point out what islamic law actually is, you claim its wrong.
Of course, your arguments have been based on your opinions, google searches and the encyclopedia.