"You grab lists, but you don't understand what's behind them"
Not lists, documentation. Again, this from the poster who thinks sharia isn't so bad.
"BTW, here you just admitted women can initiate divorce in Islam."
No, I didn't...I did cite another example of the inequal treatment of women under sharia...
You: "Actually, you haven't submitted anything in the Quran stating that a woman can't initiate divorce."
I have, repeatedly. Islamic law is based on the quran. You actually haven't READ any of the sources or documentationYou deflect this:
"Hmm, if a muslim rejects hadith antiRepub, it would make him a heretic, a blasphemer, and earn him a death sentence."
Completely true statement.
"According to the Muslims who do accept them for their various reasons. A majority of Christians don't accept Catholic canon, and long ago they would have been labeled as heretics, subject to death. Does that make them wrong?"
Oh, I knew that was coming.
"A majority of Christians don't accept Catholic canon"
Oh really? According to whom? You? Couldn't resist that, could you? Your agenda is showing.
Again, you change the subject.
You make the wildest, baseless accusations based on nothing but your opinion.
Now.
No, again, sharia is NOT "Subject to interpretation". It is, islamic law and it IS currently in practice today in Nigeria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.
It is the reality of the world situation...
You might want to actually READ the posts. It will save you much humiliation.
You are completely ignorant of sharia, islam and world events.
Again, don't waste my time with your lies, deceptions, and ignorance.
I suggest you actually read a "book" and stop wasting your time googling...
You cited an example where a woman divorcing her husband must give back her wedding money. Is English so hard?
I have, repeatedly. Islamic law is based on the quran.
You have not shown one passage that prohibits a woman from divorcing her husband.
Oh really? According to whom?
Religious census. Depending on the source, Catholics aren't even the majority of Christians in the world.
No, again, sharia is NOT "Subject to interpretation". It is, islamic law and it IS currently in practice today in Nigeria, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.
All of which practice it differently. Shari'a wasn't handed down by Mohammed long ago. It is not one document. It is purely the result of interpretations of Muslim religious texts and even the opinions of prior religious scholars, their attempt at putting the "will of Allah" as they see it into law. The culture where the shari'a was derived also has an influence.
I suggest you actually read a "book"
Any encyclopedia will tell you I'm right. Just look up the definition of Fiqh to see that there are differing views on shari'a and which Hadith are to be believed. A Hanafi ruling will probably be quite different than a Jaferi one.