Skip to comments.
Iraqis reach agreement
C-SPAN
Posted on 08/22/2005 7:30:20 AM PDT by leadpenny
I've never seen Breaking News on C-SPAN before but they just flashed a comment on the bottom of the screen that an agreement has been reached on a constitution at 10:25 ET.
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqiconstitution; progress
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
To: XJarhead
The problem is that under the system that's set up, they have the votes to scuttle the proposed Constitution when it comes up for referendum. That'd start the whole election process over again.... Your assuming all Sunni are the same politically. Don't. There are many types of Sunni, like there are many types of Baptists, and some have already agreed with the constitutional draft.
81
posted on
08/22/2005 2:13:19 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker!)
To: wayoverontheright
The strain of Islam currently practiced in Iraq, both Shia and Sunni, has consistently rejected the wahabbi influence, As has the Iranian strain. Is that any better?
82
posted on
08/22/2005 4:07:37 PM PDT
by
bill1952
("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
Comment #83 Removed by Moderator
To: jegoing
No more American blood for Islamic law!
Amen.
I am reminded of Matthew 12:
When the unclean spirit is gone out of a man, he walketh through dry places, seeking rest, and findeth none. Then he saith, I will return into my house from whence I came out; and when he is come, he findeth it empty, swept, and garnished. Then goeth he, and taketh with himself seven other spirits more wicked than himself, and they enter in and dwell there: and the last state of that man is worse than the first.
Saddam Hussein was bad. Sharia is worse.
84
posted on
08/22/2005 8:52:48 PM PDT
by
Celtman
(It's never right to do wrong to do right.)
To: Celtman
BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) -- The head of the committee drafting Iraq's constitution said Tuesday that three days are not enough to win over the Sunni Arabs, and the document they rejected may ultimately have to be approved by parliament as is and submitted to the people in a referendum. Iraqi leaders completed a draft Monday night and submitted it to parliament, but with only minutes to go before a midnight deadline, they delayed a vote to give them time to convince Sunni Arab negotiators to accept it.
To: Texas_Conservative2
"They have been saying for months now that Iraq would end up with a theocracy.."
If the clerics are given constitutional powers, that's exactly what they will end up with - and I'm as far from liberal as you can get.
86
posted on
08/23/2005 12:19:24 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: leadpenny
Did they agree to pay back the American Taxpayers the $300 Thousand Million (plus interest) that made all this possible?
Just wondering............
87
posted on
08/23/2005 12:23:03 PM PDT
by
WhiteGuy
(Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
To: HuronMan
"So be patient and don't sweat it."
Instant communication has changed the time frame within which change can and needs to occur, so although that argument has some validity, it is not completely relevant.
I suggest it is not time to go back to sleep.
88
posted on
08/23/2005 12:33:47 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: sageb1
Isn't Afghanistan's constitution based on Islam?
89
posted on
08/23/2005 12:40:11 PM PDT
by
sono
To: jveritas
"This new constitution will not create an Islamic state nor a theocracy as in Iran or Saudi Arabia. Islam will be a main source of civil laws as in the case of every muslim country in the world including Turkey, the most secular of them all. As in our case our Judeo-Chrisitan religion has influenced a lot of the thinking in writing the laws of the nation, Islam will play this role in Iraq. It will have an effect mostly on divorce, marriage and other civil cases. There will be no mullahs that will rule Iraq and women will still have the rights to vote and be elected or appointed to many government offices."
Time will tell. However, no country that relies on any form of Islamic leadership can be trusted.
90
posted on
08/23/2005 12:40:32 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: Tunehead54
"They even chose a Hadith where the prophet is supposed to have legalized having a social contract with "nonbelievers" if that contract is going to serve the interests of the community"
When will they understand that their so-called prophet was nothing but a hypocrite? He would tell them anything as long as it suited his own purpose. When one law no longer served him, he simply changed it and made up another hadith.
91
posted on
08/23/2005 12:49:54 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: sageb1
92
posted on
08/23/2005 12:54:03 PM PDT
by
sono
To: sono
I apologize. I didn't see your question earlier. Aghanistan enjoys a freah takeover every few years. Their socialist government was overthrown and replaced by the Mujahideen in 1992 (note I said replaced, no free elections here), who subsequently declared an Islamic State. Then they were replaced by the Taliban until the U.S. came in. There will always be violence and instability in any country where Islamic law takes precedence.
93
posted on
08/23/2005 1:20:28 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
To: sono
94
posted on
08/23/2005 1:22:17 PM PDT
by
sageb1
(This is the Final Crusade. There are only 2 sides. Pick one.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson