Why did CAIR drastically reduce its claims versus Whitehead?
It might have to do with Whitehead, admirably represented by Reed Rubinstein of Greenberg Traurig LLP, having responded to CAIRs lawsuit with an extensive and well informed set of discovery requests and documents. These filings perhaps established for CAIR the depth of Whiteheads knowledge and the soundness of his opinions. If so, then CAIRs leadership concluded that the bulk of its case against Whitehead would collapse in court.
CAIRs filing an amended motion has two apparent implications: that CAIR has tacitly acknowledges the truth of Whiteheads deleted assertions; and those assertions can now be repeated with legal impunity.
We list here the key statements that CAIR no longer deems legally improper, followed by some speculations as to why it might have decided not to contest them in court.
· [CAIR is an] organization founded by Hamas supporters
.
· CAIR was started by Hamas members
.
· CAIR
was founded by Islamic terrorists.
Read post #48
I'm very familiar with it.
I'm glad you posted it.