Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TAdams8591
Too bad.

Actually it was a calculated move on the part of Philip Morris.....by agreeing to stay out of how the money is spent, they were able to get the costs passed 100% onto the smokers..........the companies were never hurt, nor the stock holders....ONLY the customers.

PM remains firmly in the camp of the antis against their customer base.......because the antis are helping them keep the competition at bay.

41 posted on 08/22/2005 11:27:51 AM PDT by Gabz (USSG Warning: portable sewing machines are known to cause broken ankles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Gabz
The fact that the tobacco companies had no contingent agreement about how the money was spent, surely creates suspicion regarding the motive of the tobacco companies themselves. I'm glad you cleared it up.

Unfortunately, all companies have a habit of passing such losses onto the consumer and it is almost always the consumers who pay the penalty. This isn't common only to the Tobacco industry. It's just that few industries have had such major blows to pass along to their customers.

Too bad the tobacco industries were so duplicitous, or they could have recouped the money, lowered their prices, and in that way made up for past costs to the consumer.

Thank you for all your hard work and well-founded research.

47 posted on 08/22/2005 3:34:43 PM PDT by TAdams8591 (Member since December 1998)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson