Posted on 08/21/2005 7:21:12 PM PDT by TruthFactor
What do you expect? It was National Geographic who hired the notorious saddamite, Peter Arnett, to work on a documentary on Iraq. Public outrage forced them to fire him after he appeared on Iraqi state TV badmouthing the US.
I agree as well.
Thanks. I'll check that out ASAP. (I have a long "to read" list...) ;-)
We're suckers. Party politics always wins out. We won't slam our guy, they won't slam their guy. That's how they get away with it, time and time again.
.
Please see my Post No. 13...
AR
.
Copied & saved. and I will pass that on. Thanks.
For a more positive read on what President Bush has done Shadow War by Richard Miniter, will make you feel better after you get done screaming about Clinton, at least temporarily!
There is an audio tape of Clinton admitting his muffing a chance to get Bin Laden at least once.
"""Um Ronald Reagan for one ..."""
Bill Clinton blew up few terrorists also ... but yes I agree, there was plenty of evidence that he had a propensity to witdraw too soon.
It just about cost him his job.
OH RONNIE that been advertiste on History Channel already I wouldn't mind seeing that
Everybody know real reason why Clinton didn't go after Bin Laden it away from blow by blow with Monica
A great find, nutmeg. Thanks for finding it.
;)
clinton failed to understand that:
The sorry endpoint of this massive, 8-year clinton blunder was, of course, 9/11 and the exponential growth of al Qaeda. |
|
(may 1998)
Describe the situation when your men took down the American forces in Somalia.
The American people, by and large, do not know the name bin Laden, but they soon likely will. Do you have a message for the American people? I say to them that they have put themselves at the mercy of a disloyal government, and this is most evident in Clinton's administration.... BIN LADEN FINGERS CLINTON FOR TERROR SUCCESS (SEE FOOTAGE) |
Why don't we clean house, then?
"""clinton failed to understand that:
a terrorist war requires only one consenting player"""
Be it war or be it love, doesn't it always take at least two to tango?
I think so.
Bill knows this, the terrorists know this, Monica knows this.
Thanks for the ping!
Is that right? (This is a simple one) - Do ya think the impeached *One will ever take the blame - for ANYTHING *he caused?
No. It does not 'take two to tango' for a terrorist war to be waged. (And, as for your 'love' analogy, depending on what you mean by 'tango' it doesn't necessarily take two according to no less than clinton's own testimony under oath. (To be fair to the perjurer, he did argue that that particular form of tango was not tango.) ;) That a terrorist war (as opposed to a war between states) can be waged unilaterally is precisely my point. A terrorist war was being declared and waged against America throughout clinton's "watch" -- (the first battleground was the same building attacked by the same terrorists in '93) -- and clinton did nothing. A terrorist war was being declared and waged against America throughout clinton's "watch"... and clinton surrendered. |
"Be Liberal, Live in Ignorance and Servitude" by Gail Wynand Liberals have always had problems figuring out causation. They believe for example that because people who smoke (sometimes) have higher rates of cancer than people who don't that smoking CAUSES cancer, worse, they believe that if people get cancer it is the fault of the "tobacco companies" (i.e., caused by the manufactures of tobacco products). They further believe that the remedy for this fault is that billions of dollars in "damages" should be transferred from the wealth of stockholders in tobacco companies to a handful of plaintiffs lawyers including the First Lady's relatives and others closely associated with the Democratic party. And they believe, apparently, that if young people are now experimenting with sex at early ages and with more profoundly explicit practices than in past years, and that if the President of the United States decides to enroll a young intern in rendition of such services to his middle aged libido resultantly staining both her dress and America's reputation, that a spontaneous wave of teenage sex experimentation, sucked (sorry) the poor middle aged chief executive into its vortex. Deducing causation in most events takes deliberate, focused, thought, insight, and a disciplined intelligence that doesnt skip foundational indoctrination (aka actually studying in school). Causation of the diseases associated with cancer is highly complex and to a large degree still unknown. That smoking is probably not healthy for you is well known. That a middle aged chief executive, Yale Law School graduate, former professor of Constitutional Law and State Attorney General should be responsible and accountable for his own actions including HIS perjury and obstruction of justice would seem axiomatic to all but a liberal who has the capacity to adopt causationally convenient theories based solely on tangential proximity to the event under examination rather than through any rational analysis of the importance or significance of the asserted cause to the event. Thus, "guns" are used in some murders therefore, to a liberal all "guns" should be either banned or kept in locked safes with trigger locks so as to disarm the law abiding public and eviscerate their legally recognized right to effective self defense. Quite simply, one has to be pretty stupid or very corrupt or both to be a liberal, at least and for sure to be a Clinton supporter. But it is worse than that, one also has to deny the importance of human consciousness and free will. That is, a Clinton defending liberal apparently believes that childhood psychic trauma, teenage sex trends (remarkably and largely only rampant among the social classes targeted by liberals for social intervention for the past 40 years) and the power of "addiction" which used to be considered merely "habituation" in more stalwart times, are more significant than free will in determining human conduct.
For discussion: |
"Bill Clinton blew up few terrorists also "
refresh my memory on that one unless you mean that rocket attack on Afghanistan i do not remember him chasing anyone except Elian Gonzales and the Koresh bunch
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.