In other words, DONH, this is NOT salt over the shoulder we are talking about here. This is straight physics from the best minds out there.
Raising your voice does not improve your argument. What you are touting is commonly referred to as the anthropic argument, and it's very persuasive, if you are preaching to the choir, but it ain't science--It is flights of fancy, just like ID. Other explanations, that are on equal footing with respect to the available evidence have been put forth, and until there is some overwhelmingly good reason to prefer one over another, and we start seeing the questions booted about in refereed journals, discussing real experiments, or critically differentiating field studies, it is so much entertaining wind.