Cut your elitist crap. If you are too "educated" to comprehend the problem that a lack of fossil evidence creates for the evolutionary theory, then you are simply a highly educated fool.
Please explain to me and the rest of the uneducated fools who inhabit this country why fossil evidence exists at both the beginning of, and the end of the evolutionary chain, yet "NOTHING" exists in the middle. You can't explain it. As the top scientists of our times have also failed to do so. Keep drinking that koolaid sport...
If you are too "educated" to comprehend the problem that a lack of fossil evidence creates for the evolutionary theory,EASY spunky; we've only just BEGUN to scratch the surface of this issue with living fossil records (DNA analysis in living cratures) ...
fossil evidence exists of evolution in chains containing hundreds of intermediate fossils. Of course the more elements in the chain of fossils, the more "gaps" there are, giving you something to gripe about.
Yet nevertheless the more fossils turn up, the more they support evolution.
One of the primary ways that evolution would be falsifiable is if the fossil record were incoherent, jumping around from species to species with apparent irregularity. But that isn't what is found.
Should the discovery institute really desire to do science, then demonstrating the randomness of species would be a way to falsify evolution. Yet they don't even bring up the subject.
There is no lack of fossil evidence. There is only a lack on the part of creationists to understand why the evidence is compelling. I know this is a little hard to comprehend, but science does not operate on evidence in whatever manner some zealous non-scientists with an ax to grind insist on.
Please explain to me and the rest of the uneducated fools who inhabit this country why fossil evidence exists at both the beginning of, and the end of the evolutionary chain,
There is no "evolutionary chain"--it is a voraciously trimmed bush, and you only get to see a few leaves of that bush alive at any given moment, or ever. Thinking it is a chain is what leads to many of the dunderheaded arguments, such as this one, that creationists try to make, despite being warned not to by their cheerleader, the Discover Institute itself.
yet "NOTHING" exists in the middle. You can't explain it. As the top scientists of our times have also failed to do so. Keep drinking that koolaid sport...
Loud, rude, willfully ignorant twaddle, is still ignorant twaddle.