"You can't find them in your living room means they aren't here?"
No, if the people who have spent man-centuries and huge sums of money looking for them can't find them, they why posit that they are here?
"Pretty ludicrous for you to be claiming you stand on firm scientific grounds regarding ID"
I think you've lost track of the argument. Better go back and read the thread again. The only thing I've said about science and ID is that ID doesn't reject any part of science.
"based on the proud claim that you can't prove there wasn't intervention, whereas you reject the most obvious explanation for intervention, based on the exact same argument."
You're just whirling off into fantasy now, attributing to me things I haven't said.
"As you've just demonstrated, ID is a joke, not a science."
What has been demonstrated is that you are willing to use straw man arguments.
ID proponents reject the science of of evolution. They don't claim such a thing in public, but any honest evaluation of the supporters of ID demonstrate that they are creationists seeking a PC method to argue against evolution. Since they've failed via any scientific argument to damage evolution.
And the exact same thing can be said for scientific evidence of God's creation of life. So much for ID as a science. I'm glad we agree.