ID proponents reject the science of of evolution. They don't claim such a thing in public, but any honest evaluation of the supporters of ID demonstrate that they are creationists seeking a PC method to argue against evolution. Since they've failed via any scientific argument to damage evolution.
"ID proponents reject the science of of evolution."
I would argue that anyone who does is flying under false colors. You can't even have ID without evolution.
"but any honest evaluation of the supporters of ID demonstrate that they are creationists seeking a PC method to argue against evolution."
I don't deny that there may be such people, but to dismiss ID on those grounds is analogous to dismissing conservatism on the grounds that some conservatives might be racists.
"Since they've failed via any scientific argument to damage evolution."
There's no reason for an ID proponent even to wish to damage evolution. There's no point of dispute, until you get to the conclusion, which I think most people here agree is not scientific, that "all this proves there is no God."