To: Enchante
a slathering devotion to parsing the meaning of the myriad of rules and regulations and a failure to see their overall effects. An excellent summary.
9 posted on
08/20/2005 11:39:02 AM PDT by
livius
To: livius
Yes, that's a good one, and I also liked the quotation below. It's not pithy but it sure does summarize how Clinton treated the intel agencies - I think both of these points, the slavish legalistic bureaucrats like Gorelick and the Clinton degradation of the intel community, need to be extensively documented and presented to the public as the process of reviewing "Able Danger" and other intel issues moves forward.
"Clinton set out to reduce the risk that the Intelligence Community could do him harm by making it as difficult as possible for the Intelligence Community to do anything. He did this thru his appointments, seeing to it that political animals and risk-adverse adminstrators got key postions; by changing the rules by which intelligence could be collected -- for example, banning using people with crimnal associations or "human rights abusers" as HUMINT sources, which meant that no one in the Intelligence Community could talk to a disaffected terrorist; a huge blow that badly hurt our ability to keep tabs on terrorist organization after 1998 -- and by building walls.
12 posted on
08/20/2005 11:52:57 AM PDT by
Enchante
(Kerry's mere nuisances: Marine Barracks '83, WTC '93, Khobar Towers, Embassy Bombs '98, USS Cole!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson