Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. "concession" on Islam said to turn Iraq talks
reuters via yahoo ^ | 8/20/2005 | By Luke Baker and Michael Georgy

Posted on 08/20/2005 7:48:23 AM PDT by takenoprisoner

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - U.S. concessions to Islamists on the role of religion in Iraqi law marked a turn in talks on a constitution, negotiators said on Saturday as they raced to meet a 48-hour deadline under intense U.S. pressure to clinch a deal.

U.S. diplomats, who have insisted the constitution must enshrine ideals of equal rights and democracy, declined comment.

Shi'ite, Sunni and Kurdish negotiators all said there was accord on a bigger role for Islamic law than Iraq had before.

excerpt

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: concession; constitution; iraq; iraqiconstitution; islamiststate; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
here we go?
1 posted on 08/20/2005 7:48:24 AM PDT by takenoprisoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

I am sure the sticking point was protecting women's rights by making sure Iraq supplied state funded burkas. as opposed to them having to purchase one themselves.


2 posted on 08/20/2005 7:52:27 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

U.S. diplomats, who have insisted the constitution must enshrine ideals of equal rights and democracy, declined comment.
----
Well, if Islamic law gets in, we might as well never have gone into Iraq. PERIOD. The death of our soldiers will have been a waste.


3 posted on 08/20/2005 7:53:40 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
>We reject federalism," he repeated, underlining continued Sunni opposition to Hakim's demands. Hundreds demonstrated . . .

The Iraqis are
terrified of any form
of government that

might give their country
what free democracy gave
the United States . . .

4 posted on 08/20/2005 7:53:49 AM PDT by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Fortunately for the Japanese, we were able to impose
our type of constitution on the vanquished, that isn't
possible here, with perhaps tragic results.


5 posted on 08/20/2005 7:54:27 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

This is also reuters, so I take it with a big grain of salt.


6 posted on 08/20/2005 7:55:21 AM PDT by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Tell 'em if they want to fark up their future with backward theocratic policies, they can do it without our stamp of approval and backing. Threaten to leave.


7 posted on 08/20/2005 7:57:21 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"Sunni Arab negotiator Saleh al-Mutlak also said a deal was struck which would mean parliament could pass no legislation that "contradicted Islamic principles." A constitutional court would rule on any dispute on that, the Shi'ite official said."


8 posted on 08/20/2005 7:58:42 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"This is also reuters, so I take it with a big grain of salt."

Thank you. As news savvy as most Freepers are, it never ceases to amaze me how a an article from the NYT's, LAT's, Reuters et al can immediately launch normally rational people into loud wailing and gnashing of teeth. I pay as much attention to the written MSM as I do to the MSM nightly news. None.

9 posted on 08/20/2005 8:00:44 AM PDT by Rokke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Agreed. I hope this is not the case...


10 posted on 08/20/2005 8:00:55 AM PDT by meema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Unfortunately, the Iraqi's were going to fashion their own brand of democracy filtered through Islam. We knew that from the start but thought it worth the gamble. Only time will tell, but we'd better be prepared to protect this fledgling for quite some time. Giving them a sense of pride and accomplishment as a people would help. Education, universal literacy, jobs, etc.


11 posted on 08/20/2005 8:01:39 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EagleUSA

Agree one hundred percent. Let's wait and re: the facts, but if this is true, it is a travesty.


12 posted on 08/20/2005 8:02:29 AM PDT by Tulane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rokke
..I pay as much attention to the written MSM as I do to the MSM nightly news. None ..

Exactly. These stories come out, are shown to be false, and disappear without a trace. And still, when the next one comes out, there is always a crowd ready and willing to take it at face value.

I wonder; what is the real truth is about the latest turns in the negotiations?

13 posted on 08/20/2005 8:09:00 AM PDT by MrNatural ("...You want the truth!?...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Washington, with 140,000 troops still in Iraq, has insisted Iraqis are free to govern themselves but yet made clear it will not approve the kind of clerical rule seen in Shi'ite Iran, a state President Bush describes as "evil."

The MSM is doing such an incredible job reporting from Iraq, I'm sure the article title is not slanted in any way.

14 posted on 08/20/2005 8:10:34 AM PDT by TheDon (The Democratic Party is the party of TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner
Here we go is right. This decision is pivotal. If shari'a's nose is allowed under the tent, we will have to go into Iraq a third time. Fat chance.

If iraq once again becomes a training ground for terrorism, and the U.S. fails to halt all visits to the U.S. by muslims from any country, we are going to be in deep doo doo. With no way out.

The citizens of the U.S. will never again support a P.C. war. Not ever.
Destroy them mercilessly or surrender; those will be the two choices left. No more buying time with young American lives. Not as far as I'm concerned.

15 posted on 08/20/2005 8:11:25 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Liberal level playing field: If the Islamics win we are their slaves..if we win they are our equals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey

Sounds like what the Palestinian spokesmen in the US are already demanding of us. Of course, they reserve the right to obliterate Israel and anyone else they dislike with arms they expect us to provide.


16 posted on 08/20/2005 8:12:42 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: takenoprisoner

Nah- this is press hyperbole.

The Iraqis will NOT become another Iran if they use Islam as the moral code for their legal system and give clerics an advisory role. "Officially" recognizing clerical advisors as part of the new secular representative government is wise and natural in this culture, and the only way Islam (which unlike Christianity has political as well as spiritual role) will evolve in the modern world (aka, enlightenment...hopefully).

Remember Iraq is an experiment in finding a new, democratic, but "middle way" ... not to clone "our way". Do you want muslim clerics inside the Iraqi parliamentary process...or outside- resenting, and plotting to discredit and challenge it?

And remember when you read these press pieces, that this is the same press corps that considers Pres Bush to be a simple minded fundamentalist and the US to be in danger of Christian theocracy if we have 5 conservatives on the Supreme Court.


17 posted on 08/20/2005 8:15:15 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hershey
Only time will tell, but we'd better be prepared to protect this fledgling [Islamist state] for quite some time.

Umm. No. Let's not. Let's pretend that we are about protecting and defending liberty, not oppression. No blood for Islamism.

18 posted on 08/20/2005 8:16:03 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961

I'm with you.


19 posted on 08/20/2005 8:17:28 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

"And remember when you read these press pieces, that this is the same press corps that considers Pres Bush to be a simple minded fundamentalist and the US to be in danger of Christian theocracy if we have 5 conservatives on the Supreme Court."

I know, and that is why this better not be true. But if it is, and these concessions are being made by our US reps over there, well...I just don't have the words necessary to publish proper here without the expletives.

OTH, if it is a falsehood, Reuters will be totally discredited for good in my view.


20 posted on 08/20/2005 8:23:34 AM PDT by takenoprisoner (illegally posting on an expired tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson