Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-Hollinger executives indicted (Fraud in Chicago-- Fitzgerald says NO again)
Reuters/CNN ^ | 8-19-05

Posted on 08/19/2005 6:48:13 PM PDT by STARWISE

Two former executives and a holding company in the toppled media empire of Conrad Black were charged with fraud for diverting $32 million in fees generated by newspaper sales, prosecutors said on Thursday.

David Radler, who was president and chief operating officer of Hollinger International Inc., Hollinger's in-house lawyer Mark Kipnis, and Ravelston Corp. Ltd., Black's insolvent Toronto-based holding company, were charged in a seven-count indictment alleging fraud.

In the latest blow to Black's unraveling empire, prosecutors alleged that when newspapers were sold the defendants pocketed payments disguised as non-compete fees. Such agreements prohibit the seller from opening a rival newspaper in the same area.

The indictment charged the defendants and unnamed Ravelston "agents" were paid bonuses that were disguised as non-compete fees to avoid paying Canadian taxes. The fraud amounted to $32 million.

Radler, 63, is cooperating with prosecutors and is expected to plead guilty, said Patrick Fitzgerald, the U.S. Attorney in Chicago.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; US: Idaho
KEYWORDS: chicago; conradblack; fitzgerald; fraud; hollinger; kipnis; radler; suntimes
Black and Radler have also been sued by Hollinger Inc., essentially a Chicago-based subsidiary of Hollinger International in what is a complicated web of holding companies. Hollinger Inc. owns the Chicago Sun-Times, where Radler was the former publisher, and other newspapers. Canadian and U.S. securities regulators have also accused Black of wrongdoing.

"Whaddya want me to do?? I'm a crime fighter." (My words ;)

1 posted on 08/19/2005 6:48:15 PM PDT by STARWISE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: STARWISE

To make a criminal case out of this is, in my view, absurd. It's another example of the dangers of aggressive prosecutors attempting to regulate business, together with busy-body shareholders.

Hollinger, etc., wouldn't have existed without Black and Radler. Period.

And it isn't a cut-and-dry case. The guy who paid them most of the non-compete fees says, specifically, that they were meant to go to them. They weren't concerned that Holligner would create another paper - they were concerned that Black and Radler would.


2 posted on 08/19/2005 7:17:57 PM PDT by furquhart (Cheney-Bush '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: furquhart

this oughta be good. Radler flipped on 'em.


3 posted on 08/19/2005 9:30:58 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson