Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: STARWISE

To make a criminal case out of this is, in my view, absurd. It's another example of the dangers of aggressive prosecutors attempting to regulate business, together with busy-body shareholders.

Hollinger, etc., wouldn't have existed without Black and Radler. Period.

And it isn't a cut-and-dry case. The guy who paid them most of the non-compete fees says, specifically, that they were meant to go to them. They weren't concerned that Holligner would create another paper - they were concerned that Black and Radler would.


2 posted on 08/19/2005 7:17:57 PM PDT by furquhart (Cheney-Bush '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: furquhart

this oughta be good. Radler flipped on 'em.


3 posted on 08/19/2005 9:30:58 PM PDT by stylin19a (In golf, some are long, I'm "Lama Long")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson