Skip to comments.
Frist backs 'intelligent design' teaching
AP ^
| 8/19/5
| ROSE FRENCH
Posted on 08/19/2005 1:02:07 PM PDT by SmithL
NASHVILLE, Tenn. - Echoing similar comments from President Bush, Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said "intelligent design" should be taught in public schools alongside evolution.
Frist, R-Tenn., spoke to a Rotary Club meeting Friday and told reporters afterward that students need to be exposed to different ideas, including intelligent design.
"I think today a pluralistic society should have access to a broad range of fact, of science, including faith," Frist said.
Frist, a doctor who graduated from Harvard Medical School, said exposing children to both evolution and intelligent design "doesn't force any particular theory on anyone. I think in a pluralistic society that is the fairest way to go about education and training people for the future."
The theory of intelligent design says life on earth is too complex to have developed through evolution, implying that a higher power must have had a hand in creation. Nearly all scientists dismiss it as a scientific theory, and critics say it's nothing more than religion masquerading as science.
Bush recently told a group of Texas reporters that intelligent design and evolution should both be taught in schools "so people can understand what the debate is about."
That comment sparked criticism from opponents, including Democratic Party Chairman Howard Dean, who called Bush "anti-science."
Frist, who is considering a presidential campaign in 2008, recently angered some conservatives by bucking Bush policy on embryonic stem cell research, voicing his support for expanded research on the subject.
Frist said his decision to endorse stem cell research was "a matter of science," but he said there was no conflict between his position on stem cell research and his position on intelligent design.
"To me, I see no disconnect between that and stem cell research," Frist said. "I base my beliefs on stem cell research both on science and my faith.
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 109th; anothercrevothread; crevolist; enoughalready; frist; intelligentdesign; notagain; panderingtoignorance; scienceeducation; senatorfrist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 441-443 next last
To: Vive ut Vivas
Suppose you've got a family who doesn't want their kid taught physics, or chemistry, or history, or English. Doesn't matter - if you want your children to be intellectually incompetent, that is your choice, and remove your children from public schools. The wrong path to take is to force your mysticism on everybody else. Another thing the schools suck at is teaching manners and the ability to listen, think about, and confront the opinions of those who respectfully disagree.
I hope tommorow is a better day for you.
141
posted on
08/19/2005 3:13:05 PM PDT
by
Once-Ler
(16 months til Byrd is ousted from office, and Kennedy ain't getin younger)
To: NJ_gent
"Actually, the life of a scientist is one of perpetual self-doubt."
LOL, not on this topic apparently.
142
posted on
08/19/2005 3:13:30 PM PDT
by
TN4Liberty
(American... conservative... southern.... It doesn't get any better than this.)
To: Once-Ler
I don't know how you were fooled into beliving the GOP was antogonistic to people of faith.Too many 'people of faith' think that refusing to allow them to control every aspect of the society is 'antagonism'.
143
posted on
08/19/2005 3:15:15 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Professor
(Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - John Marburger, science advisor to George W. Bush)
To: Borges
As long as they are taught in the appropriate classes. Faith in Bible Study, Do we discuss scientific studies about prayer in Bible Study classes or in Science classes?
144
posted on
08/19/2005 3:17:02 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(You are shouting so loudly that I can't "hear" you.)
To: Petrosius
145
posted on
08/19/2005 3:18:14 PM PDT
by
Right Wing Professor
(Intelligent Design is not a scientific theory - John Marburger, science advisor to George W. Bush)
To: syriacus
Do we discuss scientific studies about prayer in Bible Study classes or in Science classes?
what exactly is a scientific study of prayer?
146
posted on
08/19/2005 3:19:14 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: RightWingAtheist
What's really scary is that people are now going to start taking Dean's comments about Bush (and by implication, all other Republicans) being "anti-science" seriously, instead of being another of his moonbat ravings. I'm one of those people. I'm sorry, but the evidence on this forum alone is overwhelming. It may not be true of Bush, but it appears to be true of Frist and many Republicans.
147
posted on
08/19/2005 3:20:56 PM PDT
by
beavus
(Hussein's war. Bush's response.)
To: NJ_gent
It's called raising the bar. First the creationists deny that speciation takes place; they when shown it does; they demand large jumps. (This should be taught in school though.)
148
posted on
08/19/2005 3:23:42 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: SmithL
I don't care what Frist thinks about anything. He lost me a long time ago.
149
posted on
08/19/2005 3:23:47 PM PDT
by
Saundra Duffy
(Never forget Terri Schindler)
To: Borges
150
posted on
08/19/2005 3:25:06 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(You are shouting so loudly that I can't "hear" you.)
To: Right Wing Professor
Too many 'people of faith' think that refusing to allow them to control every aspect of the society is 'antagonism'. Speaking as one of the majority of Americans who believe religion can be a powerful force for a healthy society, I think that refusing to allow faith any control over aspects of the society is 'antagonism.' From my point of view in the last 50 years faith has been regulated out of almost all influence in education, employment and government.
It is good to see the political trend moving towards faith friendly government.
151
posted on
08/19/2005 3:25:06 PM PDT
by
Once-Ler
(16 months til Byrd is ousted from office, and Kennedy ain't getin younger)
To: malakhi
787937467388738498774
787937467388738498775
787937467388738498776
...
152
posted on
08/19/2005 3:25:23 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Mylo
Isaac Newton also rejected the idea of trinity as absurd.
153
posted on
08/19/2005 3:26:38 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: syriacus
The power of positive thinking? A truly new and radical scientific discovery! /sarc
I would say that belongs in a psychology class.
154
posted on
08/19/2005 3:27:46 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: Doctor Stochastic
"First the creationists deny that speciation takes place; they when shown it does; they demand large jumps."
Actually, they demand that which the ToE and a hundred years of science says is impossible to prove to them that the ToE and science are valid.
The sheer illogic of their arguments is enough to make a Vulcan's head explode.
155
posted on
08/19/2005 3:27:48 PM PDT
by
NJ_gent
(Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen.)
To: Once-Ler
/From my point of view in the last 50 years faith has been regulated out of almost all influence in education, employment and government.
Exactly what 'influence' do you think faith should have in employment and goverment?
156
posted on
08/19/2005 3:30:03 PM PDT
by
Borges
To: Petrosius
Science requires no necessity for a natural explanation.Wrong. Science is by definition limited to natural explanations. That's what science does. Of course, astrology, scientology, post-modernism, creationism, are all equivalent in their anti-science stance. None belong in a science classroom.
157
posted on
08/19/2005 3:30:19 PM PDT
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Doctor Stochastic
NO TAKERS?
Come on...
Two simple questions....
1) How successful have supernatural explanations been in observing and predicting the universe and settling issues of factual disagreement?
2) How many scientific theories are dependent upon an unquantifiable and unknowable power that is impossible to observe or predict?
158
posted on
08/19/2005 3:32:14 PM PDT
by
Mylo
("Those without a sword should sell their cloak and buy one" Jesus of Nazareth)
To: syriacus
So...in which HS class do students discuss this article?
I do not think that they discuss it.
To: SmithL
The theory of intelligent design The creos have AP repeating the falsehood! We are all doomed!
160
posted on
08/19/2005 3:33:46 PM PDT
by
WildTurkey
(When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 441-443 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson