This article is pretty close to that, what happened to this fellow and he is not even an advocate of "Intelligent Design."
His great sin was apparently not working hard enough to suppress the heresy.
What you don't understand is that science is not religion and your religious fanatcism is as detrimental, or more accurately trivial and superfluous, as the heretics you live to, and love to, battle.
There are you religious fanatics like you arguing about how many angels dance on the head of a pin. You say 13, they say 14. So one guy in the 14 camp lets one of the heretics write 14 angels can dance on a pin in an obscure and unimportant magazine that usually only publishes from the 13 view and the 13 camp decides to blackball him and destroy his livlihood.
It's all so pathetic. It reminds of libertarians, Ann Rand worshippers and also Cindy Sheehan type freaks.
And there are those who are actually study the pins and learn and discover things. Look in to it.
This article is pretty close to that, what happened to this fellow
No, it isn't, but I've despaired of expecting a normal level of perspective from you.
and he is not even an advocate of "Intelligent Design."
You're as confused and wrong as usual. Sterberg certainly *is* "an advocate of 'Intelligent Design'". What hallucination led you to falsely conclude that he wasn't?
His great sin was apparently not working hard enough to suppress the heresy.
You keep talking, but all you can manage is strings of buzzwords.
What you don't understand is that science is not religion
Oh, I understand that just *fine*.
and your religious fanatcism
Wrong again.
is as detrimental, or more accurately trivial and superfluous, as the heretics you live to, and love to, battle.
You certainly have a colorful, dramatic view of me. You're a real drama queen.
There are you religious fanatics like you arguing about how many angels dance on the head of a pin. You say 13, they say 14. So one guy in the 14 camp lets one of the heretics write 14 angels can dance on a pin in an obscure and unimportant magazine that usually only publishes from the 13 view and the 13 camp decides to blackball him and destroy his livlihood.
You know, the decaffeinated brands taste just as good.
Let me know when your rant dies down and you get back to saying something that manages to resemble something I've actually said, or a position I actually hold.
It's all so pathetic. It reminds of libertarians, Ann Rand worshippers and also Cindy Sheehan type freaks.
Still waiting for you to wind down.
And there are those who are actually study the pins and learn and discover things. Look in to it.
Ooookay.
So does anyone actually want to discuss the science, or is tonight just going to be Galileo accusations, Cindy Sheehan slurs, and longwinded non sequiturs about pins?