Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138
You should not be surprised that science . . . is not terribly inclined to attribute unsolved mysteries to miracles.

Doesn't surprise me in the least. But I question why evolutionism makes positive statements about unobserved, unrecorded history and thereby thinks it has a right to piggyback on the name of science.

808 posted on 08/20/2005 5:51:23 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]


To: Fester Chugabrew
But I question why evolutionism makes positive statements about unobserved, unrecorded history and thereby thinks it has a right to piggyback on the name of science.

Like what?

812 posted on 08/20/2005 5:55:30 PM PDT by WildTurkey (When will CBS Retract and Apologize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew
I question why evolutionism makes positive statements about unobserved, unrecorded history and thereby thinks it has a right to piggyback on the name of science.

That's an excellent point to ponder.

816 posted on 08/20/2005 5:58:24 PM PDT by scripter (Let temporal things serve your use, but the eternal be the object of your desire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

To: Fester Chugabrew

Because history is not entirely unrecorded. Forensic evidence is more reliable than eyewitness evidence in many cases. It is certainly more reliable if there is a conflict between the two.


824 posted on 08/20/2005 6:05:32 PM PDT by js1138 (Science has it all: the fun of being still, paying attention, writing down numbers...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 808 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson