Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: grey_whiskers; snarks_when_bored

A clarification: the remark about 'lipstick on a pig' was not meant to suggest that Biblical stories don't have many valuable qualities. My only point was that such stories are not, nor were they ever intended to be, scientific theories.


21 posted on 08/18/2005 7:31:21 PM PDT by snarks_when_bored
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: snarks_when_bored
Aye, in complete agreement!

But "just to stir the pot" just consider how you might define a "scientific fundamentalist"--they don't know when to quit being pedantic, in all the wrong times and places.

I heard a story once about someone breaking up with a too-academic girlfriend; during the obligatory "I'm sorry it's not working out" dinner she spent the entire time pontificating about insurance fraud in ancient Greece.

But as Dilbert creator Scott Adams pointed out,
"Everyone is someone else's weirdo!"

Cheers!

34 posted on 08/18/2005 9:54:47 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson