Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researchers produce strong, transparent carbon nanotube sheets (big advance)
University of Texas at Dallas , physorg.com ^ | 18 Aug 05 | staff

Posted on 08/18/2005 5:12:15 PM PDT by Arkie2

Carbon nanotubes are like minute bits of string, and untold trillions of these invisible strings must be assembled to make useful macroscopic articles that can exploit the phenomenal mechanical and electronic properties of the individual nanotubes. In the Aug. 19 issue of the prestigious journal Science, scientists from the NanoTech Institute at UTD and a collaborator, Dr. Ken Atkinson from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO), a national laboratory in Australia, report such assembly of nanotubes into sheets at commercially useable rates.

Starting from chemically grown, self-assembled structures in which nanotubes are aligned like trees in a forest, the sheets are produced at up to seven meters per minute by the coordinated rotation of a trillion nanotubes per minute for every centimeter of sheet width. By comparison, the production rate for commercial wool spinning is 20 meters per minute. Unlike previous sheet fabrication methods using dispersions of nanotubes in liquids, which are quite slow, the dry-state process developed by the UTD-CSIRO team can use the ultra-long nanotubes needed for optimization of properties.

Strength normalized to weight is important for many applications, especially in space and aerospace, and this property of the nanotube sheets already exceeds that of the strongest steel sheets and the Mylar and Kapton sheets used for ultralight air vehicles and proposed for solar sails for space applications, according to the researchers. The nanotube sheets can be made so thin that a square kilometer of solar sail would weigh only 30 kilograms. While sheets normally have much lower strength than fibers or yarns, the strength of the nanotube sheets in the nanotube alignment direction already approaches the highest reported values for polymer-free nanotube yarns.

The nanotube sheets combine high transparency with high electronic conductivity, are highly flexible and provide giant gravimetric surface areas, which has enabled the team to demonstrate their use as electrodes for bright organic light emitting diodes for displays and as solar cells for light harvesting. Electrodes that can be reversibly deformed over 100 percent without losing electrical conductivity are needed for high stroke artificial muscles, and the Science article describes a simple method that makes this possible for the nanotube sheets.

The use of the nanotube sheets as planar incandescent sources of highly polarized infrared and visible radiation is also reported in the Science article. Since the nanotube sheets strongly absorb microwave radiation, which causes localized heating, the scientists were able to utilize a kitchen microwave oven to weld together plexiglas plates to make a window. Neither the electrical conductivity of the nanotube sheets nor their transparency was affected by the welding process -- which suggests a novel way to imbed these sheets as transparent heating elements and antennas for car windows. The nanotube sheets generate surprisingly low electronic noise and have an exceptionally low dependence of electronic conductivity on temperature. That suggests their possible application as high-quality sensors - which is a very active area of nanotube research.

"Rarely is a processing advance so elegantly simple that rapid commercialization seems possible, and rarely does such an advance so quickly enable diverse application demonstrations," said the article's corresponding author, Dr. Ray H. Baughman, Robert A. Welch Professor of Chemistry and director of the UTD NanoTech Institute. "Synergistic aspects of our nanotube sheet and twisted yarn fabrication technologies likely will help accelerate the commercialization of both technologies, and UTD and CSIRO are working together with companies and government laboratories to bring both technologies to the marketplace."

The breakthroughs resulted from the diverse expertise of the article's co-authors. Dr. Mei Zhang and Dr. Shaoli Fang, NanoTech Institute research scientists, first demonstrated the nanotube sheet fabrication process, and this result was translated into diverse applications by the entire team. The other team members include Dr. Anvar Zakhidov, associate director of the NanoTech Institute; Christopher Williams, Zakhidov's graduate student from the UTD Physics Department; Dr. Sergey Lee and Dr. Ali Aliev, research scientists at NanoTech Institute, in addition to Atkinson and Baughman.

The applications possibilities seem even much broader than the present demonstrations, Baughman said. For example, researchers from the Regenerative Neurobiology Division at Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, Dr. Mario Romero, Director, and Dr. Pedro Galvan-Garcia, Senior Researcher Associate, and Dr. Larry Cauller, associate professor in UTD's neuroscience program, have initial evidence suggesting that healthy cells grow on these sheets - so they might eventually be applied as scaffolds for tissue growth.

Baughman said that numerous other applications possibilities exist and are being explored at UTD, including structural composites that are strong and tough; supercapacitors, batteries, fuel cells and thermal-energy-harvesting cells exploiting giant-surface-area nanotube sheet electrodes; light sources, displays, and X-ray sources that use the nanotube sheets as high-intensity sources of field-emitted electrons; and heat pipes for electronic equipment that exploit the high thermal conductivity of nanotubes. Multifunctional applications like nanotube sheets that simultaneously store energy and provide structural reinforcement for a side panel of an electrically powered vehicle also are promising, he said.

UTD researchers began collaborating with their counterparts at CSIRO last year. In November 2004, the organizations achieved a breakthrough by downsizing to the nanoscale methods used to spin wool and other fibers to produce futuristic yarns made from carbon nanotubes.

The latest research was funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, an agency of the United States Department of Defense, the U.S. Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the Texas Advanced Technology Program, the Robert A. Welch Foundation and the Strategic Partnership for Research in Nanotechnology.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: batteries; fuelcells; medicine; nanotubes; solarpower; solarsails; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: Arkie2
I've been keeping my eye on the development of carbon nanotubes for the past several years, my interest and concern is, when the process is fixed, how long will it take for the cost of production to come down to a point where investment and use become affordable in a practical and meaningful way? Five years, ten, twenty?

The potential applications are overwhelming- cars, airplanes, buildings, spacecraft, artificial landmasses at sea...

61 posted on 08/19/2005 12:46:08 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
Body armor would probably render bullets obsolete. Best thing you could do with a machine gun is literally beat somebody to death with it. The impact of the round would still knock somebody over like a punch, but the bullet wouldn't go through.

Nope, just have to make bullets go faster and hit harder - think pistol-sized nanotube sabot rounds.

62 posted on 08/19/2005 12:46:15 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Consider: when Kevlar stops a handgun round, it pretty much debilitates the wearer. He's not in the fight anymore. And we're talking about handgun rounds that probly don't exceed 1200 feet per second.

So how was it that Richard Davis, president of Second Chance body armor, would shoot himself in the chest while wearing his body armor, as part of his sales pitch?

Wouldn't get too many sales if he ended up gasping on the floor and needing medical attention afterwards.

63 posted on 08/19/2005 12:51:25 PM PDT by Terabitten (Life, liberty, and the pursuit of all who threaten it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2

Wow! I wonder if this is the breakthrough they needed for the space elevator, sounds like it.


64 posted on 08/19/2005 12:59:30 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel

See, this shows where we diverge with Sci-Fi, lol. The first thing I thought of was Transparisteel from Star Wars. Trek always annoyed me to no end. :)


65 posted on 08/19/2005 1:02:50 PM PDT by Romish_Papist (Check my FR page for samples of my VERY amateur photography.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
Wouldn't get too many sales if he ended up gasping on the floor and needing medical attention afterwards.

What kind of firearm? Were the bullets standard factory issue, or were they toned down for the demonstration? (which, if they were, I'm sure no one would mention that. It'd kinda ruin the sales pitch) Given what you're saying, I seriously doubt standard manufacture ammunition was used. You can't take a .45 to the kevlar vest at short range and remain on your feet. It's not physically possible. The force of impact alone would be sufficient to knock you down, not counting any damage the impact would do to you.
66 posted on 08/19/2005 1:50:44 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Terabitten
So how was it that Richard Davis, president of Second Chance body armor, would shoot himself in the chest while wearing his body armor, as part of his sales pitch?

Ballistic info on a common pistol round, the .45 ACP

Standard .45 ACP ammo has around 400 foot pounds of energy at the muzzle. That's enough to move a four hundred pound object a foot. So if the guy weighs 175 pounds, he's going to get blown backwards at least 2.2 feet. I don't know about you, but that would knock most people cleanly to the ground with no fuss. His demonstration is either rigged, or he is an unnaturally strong or large person. I'd betting more that his demonstration is rigged.
67 posted on 08/19/2005 2:06:04 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: the anti-liberal; All

When there is commercial applications for Carbon Nanotubse what would happen to the steel industry???


68 posted on 08/19/2005 3:15:29 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
I wouldn't worry about it, maturity for the nanotube industry is a long way off, in any case, seems to me the steel industry (and nearly every other industry in the US) is already going down for the count. Personally, I'm not completely certain what we produce anymore.
69 posted on 08/19/2005 3:27:34 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (Hey, Al Qaeda: Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Wrong kind of pound. You are better off thinking in terms of momentumn - lots of the energy of the bullet will go into deforming the bullet and vest.

Momentum-wise, looks like such a bullet would impart a velocity of ~6cm/s to a 175 lb guy. I'd guess it'd look like no more than a slight backward stumble if the guy were prapared for it.

If he holds the gun himself, it'd cancel of course.

70 posted on 08/19/2005 3:47:18 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: edsheppa
Wrong kind of pound. You are better off thinking in terms of momentumn - lots of the energy of the bullet will go into deforming the bullet and vest.

Apparently not:

Last post indicates that people wearing kevlar when they get shot generally end up with broken ribs.

In other words, if this fellow did his demo and didn't end up with broken ribs and sever bruises, then the demonstration was rigged.
71 posted on 08/19/2005 4:34:22 PM PDT by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Again, there is nothing in the article that suggests that carbon nanotubes have good ballistic properties

I don't disagree with that. It's the hydrostatic shock stuff that's wrong, and BTW class IV armor WILL stop even .308 AP rounds. Yes there is bruising on some of the lighter vests when they stop a round, but that just proves my point, because the hydrostatic shock is the same plus or minus the vest (same momentum same energy that the target has to absorb.)

72 posted on 08/19/2005 5:18:38 PM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy, and Bush is no conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JamesP81
Well, that's pretty authoratative all right.

But pardon my sarcasm. For all I know, you may be right about the injuries. The point of my post was that your analysis of the physics was completely wrong. For example, it is a fundamental misunderstanding to claim that "400 foot pounds of energy" is "enough to move a four hundred pound object a foot."

73 posted on 08/19/2005 6:40:31 PM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
yes the Feds - lead by Newt and Dick Armey, as cost cutters, closed it in a 93 vote with funds ending in 95. I have the following portion of a news story - "the House of Representatives by a vote of nearly 2 to 1 has rejected the conference bill" ( which authorized it to continue ) People ran around slapping each other on the back about cutting spending - short sighted to say the least. What if they had cut off the funds for Internet research. We would still be listening to Dan Rather. I not for stupid spending on why ducks walk funny, but the science of energy and information is so different. (too long rant off)
74 posted on 08/19/2005 8:17:17 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
The House of Representatives by a vote of nearly 2 to 1 has rejected the conference bill...640 million for super collider.

Yes it happened in 93, but it happened because the cost cutting Republicans made an issue of spending and treated science like it was a farm payment or mohair subsidy.

75 posted on 08/19/2005 8:21:13 PM PDT by q_an_a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: q_an_a; All

That was so wrong... All they did was transfer the money elsewhere...


76 posted on 08/19/2005 8:44:14 PM PDT by KevinDavis (the space/future belongs to the eagles --> http://www.cafepress.com/kevinspace1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
If the nanotubes can be woven into solar sails then they should be given to Scaled Composites to produce the CEV the Shuttle replacement. It would be lightweight and STRONG.

Burt Rutan and fellow space conquerors will lead us "To Infinity and Beyond!"

77 posted on 08/19/2005 8:50:02 PM PDT by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkie2
I've also read there are serious health issues associated with the production of these nanotubes.

I've heard that, too. But what I read was about buckeyballs, not the tube configuration.

78 posted on 08/19/2005 9:51:33 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Moral Hazard
Yeah, they might have discovered the Higgs Boson. Just think of the commercial implications!

Indeed! Effective manipulation of the Higgs field would revolutionize - well, everything. Reduction of inertia (through reduction of resting mass) would allow us to save TRILLIONS in fuel costs.

79 posted on 08/19/2005 9:58:23 PM PDT by FierceDraka (The Democratic Party - Aiding and Abetting The Enemies of America Since 1968)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Physicist

Ah.. Makes some sense.

I remember George Will that weekend on ABC saying how it was a horrific mistake.

I thought it was after Republicans got control. Should've known better, thanks.


80 posted on 08/19/2005 10:33:25 PM PDT by Lauretij2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson