Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: housewife101
Is this a bad thing????

Yes. For the technological and scientific future of the country, it is a bad thing.

Having said that, and being a former English & history major myself, I don't know why people get PhDs in these areas anymore. The fields are terrifically overcrowded and wages in them are low.

In my field, there are still jobs and the wages are high. In addition, almost everyone is completely funded, so there is little doctoral debt (that happens at the lower levels). Worse comes to worse, I can take my PhD to industry. Hard to do that w/a doctorate in early 17th century Englsih women writers.

9 posted on 08/18/2005 5:12:13 PM PDT by radiohead (Proud member of the 'arrogant supermagt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: radiohead

I've known many bioscience candidates, and nearly all of them had to quit and take their masters instead. The reasons- burnout, babies, and bank accounts (they need to start working to support their new family).

But more than any other factor- low morale. They are surrounded by folks with more brains than manners or personality, including professors, underlings, and co-equal lab partners... very unpleasant people.


12 posted on 08/18/2005 5:24:42 PM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: radiohead

History fell apart after 1970, because the departments had failed to hold students to high standards. The PHD had become a "union card" for teaching in colleges. We need remember, howeever, that befpre WWII, the PHd was not needed for college work.


60 posted on 08/19/2005 9:40:39 AM PDT by RobbyS (chirho)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson