Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bay Area gets hefty grants to help homeless alcoholics
San Jose Mercury News ^ | Thu, Aug. 18, 2005

Posted on 08/18/2005 12:05:45 PM PDT by nickcarraway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2005 12:05:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Didn't the homeless problem take off when the Santatriums were closed?


2 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:11 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NormsRevenge; Dashing Dasher

Where do we sign up?


3 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:31 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I hear a giant sucking sound.


4 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:33 PM PDT by Fog Nozzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I see - quite a few social workers will become problem drinkers. $4 million will buy a lot of booze.


5 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:40 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once again a misguided liberal attempt to help people who refuse to help themselves. When will our country find personal accountability again?
6 posted on 08/18/2005 12:13:00 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Am I reading this wrong? Each of these people need essentially a $95,238.10 check to sober up???

The epitomy of "this is bullshit" has just been revealed... And, this is coming from a recovering alchoholic...


7 posted on 08/18/2005 12:17:56 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That's $23,781 / per drunk


8 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:28 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So, am I reading this right: EHC get $23781.69 per person?


9 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:43 PM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They could start passing these out to them and when they're finished drinking it, they can just live in it.


10 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:43 PM PDT by ShadowDancer (As for the types of comments I make,sometimes I just, By God,get carried away with my own eloquence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh, great... now they're all going to flock to this area. AGAIN.


11 posted on 08/18/2005 12:23:39 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

Come the revolution.


12 posted on 08/18/2005 12:25:42 PM PDT by Fog Nozzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist; Clock King

My bad, I divided by the $4 million, not the $998,831.... Still the "this is bullshit" winner!


13 posted on 08/18/2005 12:26:22 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This will fail 100%.

Guaranteed.


14 posted on 08/18/2005 12:27:14 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (Che Guevera isn't cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
I see - quite a few social workers will become problem drinkers. $4 million will buy a lot of booze.

Are you kidding? $4m isn't nearly enough. Why before you know it they'll be back for more; claiming the problem when deeper and was a lot more complex then they originally thought.

15 posted on 08/18/2005 12:36:31 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

The insurance companies bailed out on this fifteen years ago.
So, now in comes the government. AA is free.


16 posted on 08/18/2005 12:40:27 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fog Nozzle

Wouldn't just flushing the money save a lot of time?
I also wonder how much of the Grant money goes for administrative costs and why the Bay area got over a 1/3 of the grants available?


17 posted on 08/18/2005 12:40:52 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They can afford the good stuff now.


18 posted on 08/18/2005 12:41:33 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse
$95,238.10

Wonder if I can get mine retroactively?

(One day at a time since July, 1981)

19 posted on 08/18/2005 12:41:42 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Still no veto's,

wasteful spending at it's best - courtesy of the gop
20 posted on 08/18/2005 12:43:58 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson