Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bay Area gets hefty grants to help homeless alcoholics
San Jose Mercury News ^ | Thu, Aug. 18, 2005

Posted on 08/18/2005 12:05:45 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Four Bay Area communities will receive nearly $4 million in grants today to help bring chronically homeless alcoholics off the streets.

EHC Lifebuilders' ``Off the Streets for Alcohol'' pilot program was awarded a $998,831 grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, the federal agency that funds homeless services.

The largest provider of shelter, housing opportunities and support services to homeless people in Santa Clara County, EHC Lifebuilders is expected to use the grant to help approximately 42 people.

San Francisco County will receive $988,458; Contra Costa County, $996,786; and Santa Cruz County, $706,773, for their pilot programs.

The 11 grants distributed nationwide tie into a federal effort to target the population of chronically homeless, made up of people who have spent at least 365 days on the street over the past five years, with no time in transitional or supportive housing.

About 150,000 people who meet that criteria also are addicted to alcohol, said HUD spokesman Larry Bush.

``They end up using more services and more costly services than other homeless people,'' he said.

Reaching this population requires specialized outreach, but in the long term will save money in places like jails and emergency rooms, Bush says.

``It's nice to be able to put into place something that's going to move the issue forward, instead of simply reducing the lag,'' he said.

``Project Coming Home'' is part of Contra Costa County's 10-year plan to end homelessness. It sends outreach workers to visit encampments, dedicates beds for homeless people in detox and treatment programs, and offers permanent housing with supportive services at sites throughout the county.

Regional HUD Director Richard Rainey will visit the county-run men's shelter in Concord this afternoon to present a check to a group of county and state officials.

(Excerpt) Read more at mercurynews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: aid; alcoholic; bayarea; california; federal; hud; taxpayers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 08/18/2005 12:05:51 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Didn't the homeless problem take off when the Santatriums were closed?


2 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:11 PM PDT by John Will
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; NormsRevenge; Dashing Dasher

Where do we sign up?


3 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:31 PM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I hear a giant sucking sound.


4 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:33 PM PDT by Fog Nozzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I see - quite a few social workers will become problem drinkers. $4 million will buy a lot of booze.


5 posted on 08/18/2005 12:12:40 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Once again a misguided liberal attempt to help people who refuse to help themselves. When will our country find personal accountability again?
6 posted on 08/18/2005 12:13:00 PM PDT by 7thOF7th (Righteousness is our cause and justice will prevail!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Am I reading this wrong? Each of these people need essentially a $95,238.10 check to sober up???

The epitomy of "this is bullshit" has just been revealed... And, this is coming from a recovering alchoholic...


7 posted on 08/18/2005 12:17:56 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

That's $23,781 / per drunk


8 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:28 PM PDT by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So, am I reading this right: EHC get $23781.69 per person?


9 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:43 PM PDT by Clock King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
They could start passing these out to them and when they're finished drinking it, they can just live in it.


10 posted on 08/18/2005 12:21:43 PM PDT by ShadowDancer (As for the types of comments I make,sometimes I just, By God,get carried away with my own eloquence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Oh, great... now they're all going to flock to this area. AGAIN.


11 posted on 08/18/2005 12:23:39 PM PDT by Kevin OMalley (No, not Freeper#95235, Freeper #1165: Charter member, What Was My Login Club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 7thOF7th

Come the revolution.


12 posted on 08/18/2005 12:25:42 PM PDT by Fog Nozzle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist; Clock King

My bad, I divided by the $4 million, not the $998,831.... Still the "this is bullshit" winner!


13 posted on 08/18/2005 12:26:22 PM PDT by Hand em their arse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

This will fail 100%.

Guaranteed.


14 posted on 08/18/2005 12:27:14 PM PDT by Sometimes A River (Che Guevera isn't cool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
I see - quite a few social workers will become problem drinkers. $4 million will buy a lot of booze.

Are you kidding? $4m isn't nearly enough. Why before you know it they'll be back for more; claiming the problem when deeper and was a lot more complex then they originally thought.

15 posted on 08/18/2005 12:36:31 PM PDT by yankeedame ("Oh, I can take it but I'd much rather dish it out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

The insurance companies bailed out on this fifteen years ago.
So, now in comes the government. AA is free.


16 posted on 08/18/2005 12:40:27 PM PDT by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fog Nozzle

Wouldn't just flushing the money save a lot of time?
I also wonder how much of the Grant money goes for administrative costs and why the Bay area got over a 1/3 of the grants available?


17 posted on 08/18/2005 12:40:52 PM PDT by lastchance (Hug your babies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

They can afford the good stuff now.


18 posted on 08/18/2005 12:41:33 PM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hand em their arse
$95,238.10

Wonder if I can get mine retroactively?

(One day at a time since July, 1981)

19 posted on 08/18/2005 12:41:42 PM PDT by Graybeard58 (Remember and pray for Sgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Still no veto's,

wasteful spending at it's best - courtesy of the gop
20 posted on 08/18/2005 12:43:58 PM PDT by WhiteGuy (Vote for gridlock - Make the elected personally liable for their wasteful spending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson