Skip to comments.
Cindy Sheehan: The Media’s Desperate Search for an anti-war Movement that Is Not There
columnist and radio talk show host on KOGO AM 600 based in San Diego ^
| August 18, 2005
| Steve Yuhas
Posted on 08/18/2005 2:27:43 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
***....
Enter Move America Forward that will have a caravan to Crawford, Texas that will traverse California then head out to the Lone Star State. The convoy will star a mother proud of her son and his service, Deborah Johns of California Marine Moms, and will begin near San Francisco and culminate with a We Support Our Troops AND Their Mission rally on Saturday August 27, 2005 at 1:00PM in Crawford, Texas. Well see if the media covers the rally the way theyve been covering the mother of one veteran and a few dozen of her closest new friends that just happen to belong to some of the most radical groups in the country. ...***
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Norah O'Donnell was substituting on 'Spitball' for Chris Matthews last night. Pat Buchanan was a guest with Sen. Breaux. The Sheehan matter was one of the subjects.
Eventully Pat predicted rather vehemently and with not a little joy that some Democrat is going to break with the Hillary Clintons of the party and join this "Sheehan Charade" (my phrase) and run as an anti-war candidate for president as did George McGovern or Eugene McCarthy back in '68. Buchanan was serious, and he acted like he felt it was nearly a certainty.
He seemed to really be enjoying the discomfort this is causing G.W. and the Republicans. It was a little gross.
2
posted on
08/18/2005 2:34:10 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
This is a pretty good explanation of the media's behavior. They thrive on conflict and head to head battles. This is why they provided pretty good imbed coverage during the initial battles, but have gone way negative trying to find the bad news in the occupation.
3
posted on
08/18/2005 2:37:59 AM PDT
by
Wiseghy
(Part of the True Conservative Majority of Kaleefahrnya)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
I'm convinced that the only reason there aren't more people on our side at the demonstrations is that we have jobs.
4
posted on
08/18/2005 2:42:07 AM PDT
by
wolfpat
(dum vivimus, vivamus)
To: beyond the sea
One thing is certain.......She will not be "standing on the LAWN of the WH" when she goes to DC.
5
posted on
08/18/2005 2:45:05 AM PDT
by
Carolinamom
(Life is a journey, not a destination.)
To: beyond the sea
Buchanan's stellar 2000 "Reform" vote totals were what, 1%?
To: wolfpat
To: wolfpat; AGreatPer
There was a gentleman who joined us last night in Harrisburg. A Gulf War vet named Reed.
He said he was on his way home from one of his two jobs when he saw "those scumbags" supporting Cindy.
He went home, made a sign, and joined us on the street corner.
BTW, his sign said, "We Gave Peace A Chance, And 9/11 Happened!"
8
posted on
08/18/2005 2:47:25 AM PDT
by
airborne
To: Cincinatus' Wife
9
posted on
08/18/2005 2:48:05 AM PDT
by
W04Man
(Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign We Did It! Now on to 2008: http://Allen4President.com)
To: Wiseghy
Besides being LIBERALLY biased, the media tends to be lazy and ignorant. They follow the leader and then file their stories.
To: airborne; W04Man
To: beyond the sea
Just think, if Cindy Sheehan and Pat Buchanan were living under a regime like Saddam Hussein's, they'd be dead now. But that's what they want for millions of Iraqis.
12
posted on
08/18/2005 2:50:15 AM PDT
by
advance_copy
(Stand for life, or nothing at all)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Won't somebody, for the love of God, please give that woman some lithium?
It's just sad.
13
posted on
08/18/2005 2:52:36 AM PDT
by
Majic
(Temporary taxes are as common as temporary death.)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Cindy Sheehan is currently The Worlds Biggest Terrorist because she is attempting to destroy our will to protect ourselves and is demanding we leave Iraq so the Terrorists can run it like they used to do Afghanistan and thereby she is creating the ground work for the next 9/11 or most likely worse.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
15
posted on
08/18/2005 2:57:17 AM PDT
by
Flyer
( * Post Grad - University of Google *)
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Heck - the AP and major newspaper editors admitted that they don't know what is going on in Iraq. One of the bigwigs at the AP actually said that it was easier to count the number of deaths than to figure out how many hours of electricity they had in Iraq.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1464300/posts
16
posted on
08/18/2005 2:59:59 AM PDT
by
Chickenhawk Warmonger
("A Quagmire of Hate" coming soon to a bookstore near you)
To: Flyer
From your LINK:
***The Heart of Texas Chapter is planning a return to Crawford on Saturday, August 27. Our purpose this time will be to team up with the Move America Forward Caravan, which will originate in California, and pick up supporters from across the country. ......***
Bump!
To: Chickenhawk Warmonger
From your LINK;
***....Mike Silverman, managing editor of the Associated Press, lamented the fact that explosions and shootings and fatalities and injuries on some days seem to dominate the news. Silverman cited the dangers in Iraq as one of the reasons reporters were not getting more of the good things. Kathleen Carroll, the APs Executive Editor, actually said that it was much easier to add up the number of dead than to determine how many hospitals received power on a particular day or how many schools were built. Silverman than threw out the typical media excuse the positives listed in the email were actually in various AP stories but they were buried in the articles. ............***
Bump!
To: beyond the sea
Eventully Pat predicted rather vehemently and with not a little joy that some Democrat is going to break with the Hillary Clintons of the party and join this "Sheehan Charade" (my phrase) and run as an anti-war candidate for president as did George McGovern or Eugene McCarthy back in '68. Well, that worked out pretty well for the 'Pubbies, didn't it? McGovern won, what, one state?
The Donks will eventually fracture along the war/anti-war fault. The anti-war radicals will not be able to support any candidate who does not issue a full throated condemnation of the war. Hillary! will not be able to do this, so she will lose the Left of her party by trying to hold the Center.
Given this calculus, I don't see how Hillary! can win in 2008.
My personal fantasy scenario is that Hillary! faces a strong enough challenge next year for NY Senate that she drops out of that race to run for President and then finds out the race for President is not going to work out, and she drops out of that too. Then she'll be left holding all of the Donk's campaign money, with no way to spend it. I think Hillary! was a one-hit-wonder. I don't think she has another victory in her.
19
posted on
08/18/2005 3:07:30 AM PDT
by
gridlock
(IF YOU'RE NOT CATCHING FLAK, YOU'RE NOT OVER THE TARGET...)
To: advance_copy
20
posted on
08/18/2005 3:16:00 AM PDT
by
beyond the sea
("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-66 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson