Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More homes in U.S. go solo [single-adult households outnumber two-parent households for first time]
Washington Times ^ | August 17, 2005 | Cheryl Wetzstein

Posted on 08/17/2005 2:56:58 PM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative

Single-adult households have displaced two-parent families with children as the most common kind of U.S. household, the Census Bureau reported yesterday.

    The change demonstrates "the growing complexity" of American households, researchers said in a new report, "Examining American Household Composition: 1990 and 2000."

    "It's breathtaking how many people still think that the 'mom, pop and two kids' is the majority of households," said Peter Francese, the founder of American Demographics magazine.

    Nuclear-family households -- two married parents and a child -- were the most common as recently as 1990, when there were 25 million such households.

    But by 2000, nuclear-family households fell to second place, both because there were almost a half-million fewer of these type of homes and because the number of single-adult households surged past 27 million.

    Married households without children remained the third most common, with 20 million in 1990 and 22 million in 2000.

    Mr. Francese, who has studied U.S. demographic trends for 35 years, said single-adult households are continuing to grow and might even hit 34 million by the 2010 census.

--Snip--

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last
To: GoLightly
If you enter into it while you are in a rational state of mind, YES!

So marriage itself is not proof that a man was in an irrational state of mind?

81 posted on 08/17/2005 5:19:22 PM PDT by beavus (Hussein's war. Bush's response.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

There are immediate benefits to having children. They make you humble. They push you to be more than you ever thought you could be, because they challenge you. They allow you to do childish things again, without feeling stupid about doing them. (When is the last time you finger painted, played with play dough or built a fort or snow man?) Having children is in some ways a refresher course in the greatest simple joys in life.


82 posted on 08/17/2005 5:21:15 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: beavus
So marriage itself is not proof that a man was in an irrational state of mind?

No, it is not. Character matters.

83 posted on 08/17/2005 5:27:54 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: LanPB01
After reading some of your other statements, I realize you are not worth talking to.

And this is why you decided to talk to me?

84 posted on 08/17/2005 5:28:01 PM PDT by ExitPurgamentum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
I think they were psycho before the marriage & the people marrying them turn a blind eye to it.

Quite correct. There are almost always warning signs...but a lot of people marry a certain set of physical or financial attributes and ignore or choose to overlook the character of the individual.

The seeds of most of these bad divorce outcomes were sown before the marriage ever took place.

85 posted on 08/17/2005 5:31:26 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("Feelings are not a tool of cognition, therefore they are not a criterion of morality." -- Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GoLightly
There are immediate benefits to having children.

Sure, I don't have a problem with people having children because of immediate benefits. That is when one should find whatever benefits you expect.

My objection is to the idea that people should have children so that we can turn them into de facto slaves when they become adults. There are many people on FR that view children as little more than future adults to suck taxes from or to serve them in their dotage. It is a pretty sick view, but a lot of people have it.

86 posted on 08/17/2005 5:36:17 PM PDT by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum

Excellent analysis!


87 posted on 08/17/2005 5:36:27 PM PDT by walden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
The seeds of most of these bad divorce outcomes were sown before the marriage ever took place.

Monday morning quarterbacking.

88 posted on 08/17/2005 5:40:10 PM PDT by beavus (Hussein's war. Bush's response.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: lightislife; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; Jhoffa_; FITZ; arete; FreedomPoster; Red Jones; ...
[lightislife:] This statistic shows that our economy has progressed and it is now easier for a person to be independant on the average wage.

Especially that with the new free market borderless global economy having and raising children became obsolete. We can the import new generations of Americans from the Third World countries at the fraction of effort and expense.

89 posted on 08/17/2005 5:52:47 PM PDT by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole

we have more young people then ever living in their parent's basements. these single-adult households are likely the result of the high divorce rate - the wife gets the house, and ex-husband has to live someplace.


90 posted on 08/17/2005 5:54:57 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Constitutionalist Conservative; A. Pole

This also reflects the aging population, with a larger proportion of widows and widowers.


91 posted on 08/17/2005 5:57:42 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tortoise

You make an excellent point. Being a parent isn't for everyone. And most generations of people became parents for the exact reasons you stated. That doesn't mean they didn't love their children, but their actions came from self-interest. Arranged marriages, indentured servitude, and child labor of the past prove that.

People who raise children and do a good job deserve commendation and support, but that doesn't mean that everyone should do it.


92 posted on 08/17/2005 6:11:32 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Jeanine Pirro for Senate, Hillary Clinton for Weight Watchers Spokeswoman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: ExitPurgamentum
What pride is there in living for oneself?

Unlike most married folks, they're not asking for handouts, or special tax breaks to support them.

93 posted on 08/17/2005 6:16:14 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
My objection is to the idea that people should have children so that we can turn them into de facto slaves when they become adults.

By your standard, every single responsible parent is a de facto slave. Unless you favor euthanasia for people when they become useless eaters, "giving back" to people who once gave is a reality.

94 posted on 08/17/2005 6:21:36 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued
People who raise children and do a good job deserve commendation and support, but that doesn't mean that everyone should do it.

According to the Free Market rules, raising of children should be done where it is cheapest. In other words:

The Law of Comparative Advantage dictates that "Americans should not have children!"

95 posted on 08/17/2005 6:33:05 PM PDT by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
Unlike most married folks, they're not asking for handouts, or special tax breaks to support them.

Why not make personal exemption for each human being the same - INCLUDING CHILDREN?

96 posted on 08/17/2005 6:34:54 PM PDT by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
Why not make personal exemption for each human being the same - INCLUDING CHILDREN?

They make no money, they pay no taxes.

That's why we need a consumption tax. To get rid of all these government entitlements programs.

97 posted on 08/17/2005 6:41:22 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
They make no money, they pay no taxes.

But they need to eat, be dressed, housed etc ... We should stop child penalty tax. Each human being - the same exemption.

That's why we need a consumption tax.

You want parents to pay more tax? (Children are additional consumers)

98 posted on 08/17/2005 6:45:16 PM PDT by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: A. Pole
You want parents to pay more tax? (Children are additional consumers)

I must assume you subscribe to this philosophy.

From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.

99 posted on 08/17/2005 6:54:12 PM PDT by Doe Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Doe Eyes
I must assume you subscribe to this philosophy. From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs.

If you willfully [if you are childless by choice] refuse to raise your own children you refuse to contribute to the survival of the society in which you live. Why at the old age you should be taken care of by the other people's children?

Do you support euthanasia?

100 posted on 08/17/2005 6:59:51 PM PDT by A. Pole (" There is no other god but Free Market, and Adam Smith is his prophet ! ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-138 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson