To: Lando Lincoln
Might I point out that the Bush administration selected several of the CYA 9/11 commission? I'm sure neither Bush or Rice or Ashcroft ever heard about Able Danger until recently. It was kept from them. Deni-ability?
The methods employed by Able Danger are not now in use. In fact this is what brought Weldon into this when he talked to Shaffer about reassembling the mechanisms for mining data.
What are we concerned with here? Protecting OUR politicians or protecting this nation?
14 posted on
08/17/2005 12:55:55 PM PDT by
mercy
(never again a patsy for Bill Gates - spyware and viri free for over TWO YEARS now)
To: mercy
What are we concerned with here? Protecting OUR politicians or protecting this nation?
We're all concerned about protecting the nation. What are you concerned about?
To: mercy
Might I point out this 911 Commission was nothing but a facade which we saw the Democrats once again use it to try to place the blame squarely on President Bush's shoulders. Give us all a break and grow up.
18 posted on
08/17/2005 1:06:57 PM PDT by
Paige
("Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism." --George Washington)
To: mercy
"Might I point out that the Bush administration selected several of the CYA 9/11 commission? I'm sure neither Bush or Rice or Ashcroft ever heard about Able Danger until recently. It was kept from them. Deni-ability?" Loosen the aluminum foil. The only a$$ the 9/11/01 Commission remotely covered was Clinton's. The report was complimentary to neither administration.
"What are we concerned with here? Protecting OUR politicians or protecting this nation?"
Clarification is needed to make this statement other than a non sequitur
19 posted on
08/17/2005 1:09:16 PM PDT by
cake_crumb
(Leftist Credo: "One Wing to Rule Them all and to the Dark Side Bind Them")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson