Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"This article raises more questions than it answers, the primary question being 'how did he or his predecessors come into original possession of these letters?"

I don't think anyone knows. The state claims they are official documents, but can't prove it. Maybe 130 years ago, the state sold the documents to a scrap dealer or an auction house. Maybe the family PAID for the documents. The point is, I don't think the state can just claim ownership when there's no proof the family didn't obtain the documents legitimately.

Here's a comparative example: public libraries routinely sell off old books that are deemed of no lasting significance. Suppose I buy one of these books and it stays in my family for 100 years, and it turns out to be worth $100,000. Then my descendent files for bankruptcy and the $100,000 book goes into court and someone sees a Seattle Public Library stamp on the book, so the City finds out about this and claims title to the book. That's not too different from what's happening in this case.
65 posted on 08/17/2005 1:45:09 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: Steve_Seattle

I can see your point.


80 posted on 08/17/2005 2:20:36 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson