Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CARRYING-hillary's-ANTI-PIRRO-WATER club
8.16.05 | Mia T

Posted on 08/16/2005 11:47:32 AM PDT by Mia T

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

1 posted on 08/16/2005 11:47:52 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Count me in Mia.


2 posted on 08/16/2005 11:49:12 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Ignorance is a condition. Stupidity is a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AliVeritas

thanx ;)


3 posted on 08/16/2005 11:52:16 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jla; WorkingClassFilth; Gail Wynand; Brian Allen; Wolverine; Lonesome in Massachussets; IVote2; ...

`Nevermore.' ping


4 posted on 08/16/2005 11:55:32 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jla

ping


5 posted on 08/16/2005 11:57:15 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkingClassFilth

ping


6 posted on 08/16/2005 11:57:39 AM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

Much as I despise the Hillary water carriers, let's not hitch our wagon to a RINO with corrupt associates.


7 posted on 08/16/2005 11:58:38 AM PDT by Clemenza (Love Thyself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Did anyone else beside me think that a Hillary goon deliberately pulled out page 10 to make Pirro look bad out of the box?


8 posted on 08/16/2005 12:04:08 PM PDT by princess leah (\)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

IT DOESN'T MATTER! Fighting Hillary with someone of questionable ethics is not the right way to go about things.


9 posted on 08/16/2005 12:05:05 PM PDT by Clemenza (Love Thyself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
You would think that Hillery would try to accommodate her constituents by at least having one of her servants answer some of the emails sent to her. In five years I have yet to have on of my many, many emails responded to. A form email is always automatically sent, letting her "subjects" know how hard she is working for us and that her heinousness is much too busy to respond to us low life mortals. My last email I simply asked for the two hundredth time to send me a copy of her 2000 plan for adding 200,000 jobs to upstate NY. It was this great plan she campaigned on but never presented any details on. As of July not only had we not added one of the 200,000 promised jobs but we gave up an additional 150,000 job losses. I asked her to pleas let us know when we could expect the 350,000 jobs to return under her plan and could she please share it with the people in upstate NY. Yep, Zero again just like her. She is just revolting and would not know the truth if it jumped up and bit her in that huge bottom of hers. Amen.
10 posted on 08/16/2005 12:15:13 PM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza; Mia T
Clemenza,

N.Y. politics are a bit of a mystery to me.Apparently the Ds are Marxists and the Rs are liberals.

If you know anything about N.Y. politics(from your days with Don Corleone-;o) ) maybe you can help me out.

I want the R candidate to do as much damage as possible to Her Thighness.Who could do that in your opinion?

Thanks, Pittsburgh "Pistol" Pete

11 posted on 08/16/2005 12:22:54 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
This issue really isn't about Jeanine Pirro.
It's about hillary clinton.

The 2006 election is a dry run for missus clinton.
Are we going to allow her to run a furtive campaign once again?
Are we going to allow the clinton agitprop machine paint some idealized picture of this dangerous, corrupt grotesquerie?

Or will we force her to stand upon her own so that the voter will be able to see her for what she really is?



That said, regarding your RINO complaint:

Pirro will support:

  • Bush's national security and war-on-terror agendas
  • Bush's judicial nominations, which is where the real leverage is on the abortion issue--NB pro-lifers!
  • Bush's fiscal policies

So there is every difference in the world between Pirro and clinton.

And this doesn't begin to consider hillary clinton's corruption, betrayal and ineptitude. Or the rapes and other predation.

Let us not forget that it was hillary clinton who hired Jamie Gorelick. Gorelick proceeded to do hillary clinton's bidding, which undermined the national security and was the efficient cause of 9/11.

Why hillary clinton should never be allowed anywhere near the Oval Office... or any position of power--THE SERIES
REASON 1: MISSUS CLINTON HIRED JAMIE GORELICK

 

The contrast between these two women could not be more stark.

BEAUTY AND THE HILDABEAST
  • JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman
  • HILLARY CLINTON: 30-year career abusing women
 
JEANINE PIRRO: 30-year career fighting for the abused woman

 
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

New York, New York -- if hillary can't make it there, she can't make it anywhere

 

HILLARY DUD -- NOT DUFF -- PORTENDS JEANINE WIN

 

"Married to the Mob" and other stop-Jeanine sillygisms
 
 
 
"While the Republicans are (place some nasty verb here), a clinton is working hard for the people"

 

 

 

12 posted on 08/16/2005 12:23:44 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


13 posted on 08/16/2005 12:30:50 PM PDT by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: princess leah

Not to be overly conspiratorial, but that thought had occurred to me, too.

In fact, there is a bit of supporting evidence for this. As I recall the cutoff words on page 9 were "hillary clinton" or some variation thereof. So, in other words, Jeanine was rendered speechless after uttering the creature's name.... A perfect segue....


14 posted on 08/16/2005 12:32:36 PM PDT by Mia T (Stop Clintons' Undermining Machinations (The acronym is the message.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Jeanine has the best chance against the witch and she cannot sling mud without it coming back on her double. This is as good as it gets to take Hitlery out.


15 posted on 08/16/2005 12:43:03 PM PDT by John Lenin (If they slash your tire you slash there brake lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Pirro is a scumbag. We'll NEVER have a conservative win against Hillary in NY State. I still think that Patakifeller would've been a better choice.


16 posted on 08/16/2005 1:31:09 PM PDT by Clemenza (Pirro is Hillary with an (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
So if I get you straight,we should all just throw up our hands and quit.

Anoint Her Thighness the Queen of New York and humble ourselves before her "Inevitable Almighty Visage".

Not much of a plan,Clemenza.

I'm throwing in with Pirro.If New York insists on a "scumbag"(your word) at least it should be a Republican one.

Cheers!

17 posted on 08/16/2005 3:11:26 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
John Spencer and Charles Cox are also running.

Your attitude reminds me of the old Italian adage to "hold your nose and vote for the Christian Democrats" (the communists being the other major party in Italy at that time).

18 posted on 08/16/2005 3:14:27 PM PDT by Clemenza (Pirro is Hillary with an (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
Ha! American politics gives us ample opportunity for noseholding.

BTW,I thought it was Edward Cox,Nixon's son-in-law.Who's Charles Cox,or John Spencer for that matter.

Are they conservatives,the one's you say don't stand a chance?

19 posted on 08/16/2005 3:23:14 PM PDT by smoothsailing (Qui Nhon Turtle Co.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mia T

bump


20 posted on 08/16/2005 4:26:36 PM PDT by Wolverine (A Concerned Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson