Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Most people never bought the story that the Chinese bought this relatively new carrier hull from Ukraine to make it into a floating Casino...particularly when it was revealed that the "company" that bought it had extremely close ties to the Chinese Military (surprize), and then especially after the purchase and towing to China when that "company" went out of business.

Now, as work continues and the vessel takes on more and more vistage of a ship being worked on and potentially prepared for service, that is all the more obvious.

China is embarked on one of the largest naval military buildups in history. Given the miriad of new vessels they are building, including all of the vessels necessary to comprise a Carrier Battle Group, except the carrier, an operational Chinese carrier group in the China Sea will pose a major upset in the balance of power.

For much more information on the Chinese Naval buildup, see:


1 posted on 08/14/2005 6:00:26 PM PDT by Jeff Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: joanie-f; Dukie; Squantos; JohnHuang2; RobFromGa; k.trujillo; Travis McGee; jim macomber; ...

For those following the continued PLAN (Red Chinese Navy) buildup...this latest from Jane's on the carrier.


2 posted on 08/14/2005 6:01:19 PM PDT by Jeff Head (www.dragonsfuryseries.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

It just seems odd to me that a regime which is basing a new blue water fleet on the submarine, and concentrating on developing and amassing anti-carrier weapons, would bother with an expensive-and in their view, eventually worthless-weapons system like an aircraft carrier.


3 posted on 08/14/2005 6:03:40 PM PDT by warchild9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

I acquired this photo at great risk.

4 posted on 08/14/2005 6:05:30 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Casino ship or not, it still seems like there's alot of gambling involved.


5 posted on 08/14/2005 6:07:19 PM PDT by kcar (theUNsucks.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Communist China has Imperialistic ambitions...


6 posted on 08/14/2005 6:07:50 PM PDT by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

big whoop.......buying a aircraft carrier dont mean squat until you have experience in sea warfare. Which China DOESNT.


8 posted on 08/14/2005 6:09:18 PM PDT by Tiger Smack (www.tigersmack.com <------- for LSU & SEC sports/news/stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
epairing a badly damaged ex-Russian

I missed something here... How did it get damaged?

10 posted on 08/14/2005 6:09:45 PM PDT by konaice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
That aircraft carrier will be used to put Chinese aircraft in the Caribbean and central America. It is not tactically significant, but it does have strategic value. There will be occasions where the Chinese will use their aircraft to annoy and distract our military operations.
14 posted on 08/14/2005 6:12:33 PM PDT by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
Still, China's ultimate intentions for the Varyag remain unclear.

Seems plain as day to me

16 posted on 08/14/2005 6:13:12 PM PDT by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Bump to send to Chinese friend.


18 posted on 08/14/2005 6:13:45 PM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head
If you look at the bow, it appears to be a jump jet carrier rather than a full sized fleet carrier.

SO9

20 posted on 08/14/2005 6:13:57 PM PDT by Servant of the 9 (Those Poor Poor Rubber Cows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head; warchild9

Don't tell the ChiComs, but we would sink their little boat without even seeing it....


22 posted on 08/14/2005 6:15:14 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Waiting for Willie's boohoohoo of the week....next week, 200 strippers laid off in Tampa......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

The UN refused to classify this ship as a floating casino after becoming suspicious when the inspecting team pulled one of the slot machine handles and it launched three missiles. ;>


23 posted on 08/14/2005 6:16:04 PM PDT by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

let them build two, two carriers, two bombs, they are out alot of money


31 posted on 08/14/2005 6:26:14 PM PDT by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

It would be relatively inexpensive to dress it up properly, add a number of escort ships, and then cruise it around the world making port calls everywhere.

The diplomatic PR value would far outweigh the cost.

It doesn't actually have to work as a combat platform to sway the easily impressed.


60 posted on 08/14/2005 6:45:40 PM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

That's going to make one heck of an artificial reef after the U S Navy gets through with it.


61 posted on 08/14/2005 6:45:45 PM PDT by NCC-1701 (ISLAM IS A CULT!!!!! IT MUST BE ERADICATED FROM THE FACE OF THE EARTH.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

Let em! We have seven.

And when THEY have seven carriers we'll show em the black triangles that hover silently and defy gravity.


68 posted on 08/14/2005 6:52:04 PM PDT by mercy (never again a patsy for Bill Gates - spyware and viri free for over a year now)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

A few Exocet missiles and the mighty carrier YingYang or whatever they're going to call it goes down to Dae-Vee-Joes locker.


78 posted on 08/14/2005 7:02:40 PM PDT by Mad Mammoth (Gunny Ermey: "What do you MEAN, IF Jesus was a Marine? He IS a MARINE! The Toughest One Of Em All!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

It will make a nice reef.


92 posted on 08/14/2005 7:13:53 PM PDT by BigCinBigD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Jeff Head

If nothing else the Varyag with be used for training purposes. I don't think the Chinese would be stupid enough to deploy it. It maybe the next step in understanding of carrier operations since they are new to the game. How many of their pilots have ever landed on a carrier at sea? Do they have know carrier safety procedures, such fire suppression? I can imagine their first few attempts at landing on carrier at sea will be very interesting. I am suggesting it will be a long time before you see sizable numbers of Chinese Carriers on the high seas.


123 posted on 08/15/2005 6:38:52 AM PDT by Kuehn12 (Kuehn12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson