Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/14/2005 10:38:56 AM PDT by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: george76

TKS?


2 posted on 08/14/2005 10:40:12 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
One Dietrich Snell ---

a name to remember...

3 posted on 08/14/2005 10:44:40 AM PDT by beyond the sea ("If you think it's hard to meet new people, try picking up the wrong golf ball." - Jack Lemmon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Sounds like Snell's conflict is as malodorous as Gorelick's.


4 posted on 08/14/2005 10:45:34 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

bttt


7 posted on 08/14/2005 10:48:10 AM PDT by firewalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Good one.


8 posted on 08/14/2005 10:49:38 AM PDT by spycatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
From FrontPage, we find a most intriguing lead. One Dietrich Snell seems to have a Carmen Sandiego quality--he turns up wherever you look. He was a co-prosecutor on the 1993 WTC case. He appears to have turned down a terrorists' offer to betray Operation Bojinka, which was an aborted al Qaeda op that eerily foreshadowed 9-11.

If I'm not mistaken, Mr. Snell (actually I think it's "Schnell") was also a fairly high-ranking member of the 9/11 Commission staff. I'll try to find a link for that; I'm certain that I've seen it cited here on FR.

9 posted on 08/14/2005 10:50:33 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

The point to remember is that the 9/11 Commission
public hearings were nothing but a staged attack
on President Bush. What more is there to said about
whether they would lie to protect themselves?


11 posted on 08/14/2005 10:52:05 AM PDT by Hans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
Mary Jo White, prosecutor of the 1993 WTC bombers, complained in two separate memos--both of which are still secret, and neither of which figured into the 9-11 commission's final report--that the wall would make it next to impossible to prevent terrorist attacks on US soil and would probably result in loss of life.

Collusion in it's highest form. The memos could be the Blue Dress, how can the New york Times, Time, News Week, The Globe, LA Times, not be interested in what these memos have to say. The only answer is their exposure would be devastating to the Liberals.

12 posted on 08/14/2005 10:54:06 AM PDT by BIGZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

"Czech intelligence insists happened and to this day is only refuted by US sources because Atta's cell phone was used in the US when he was supposed to be in Prague."

Sorry. But this is intellectually lazy. The 9/11 report listed quite a number of reasons to disbelief the Czech account. The cell phone was just one of many.

It is misinformation like this that hurts getting to the truth.


16 posted on 08/14/2005 10:59:24 AM PDT by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
"One Dietrich Snell seems to have a Carmen Sandiego quality--he turns up wherever you look. He was a co-prosecutor on the 1993 WTC case. He appears to have turned down a terrorists' offer to betray Operation Bojinka, which was an aborted al Qaeda op that eerily foreshadowed 9-11."

The *co-prosecutor* in the 1993 WTC case turned down information regarding another terrorist plot? What?

That isn't all. Snell was also made Senior Counsel and was part of the a "team leader" for the 9/11 Commission!

Oh. It gets better! One of the possible scenarios of Operation Bojinka was to crash dive an airliner into CIA headquarters.

So... Snell turned down an offer regarding information that had direct implications concerning 9/11. And guess as to who hired Mr. Snell? Anyone?

17 posted on 08/14/2005 11:00:32 AM PDT by Reactionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/

Good blog on the subject, check his blogs from the past few
days. Found him on Hugh Hewitt's web page.


21 posted on 08/14/2005 11:09:39 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/

Good blog on the subject, check his blogs from the past few
days. Found him on Hugh Hewitt's web page.


22 posted on 08/14/2005 11:09:40 AM PDT by Burlem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer.

Has anyone heard Weldon or anyone else state that Able Danger can place Atta in Prague? If we can do this, it will virtually kill the left and their mantra that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/05226/553271.stm


25 posted on 08/14/2005 11:15:42 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Another thing: could there be two Mohammade Attas?


31 posted on 08/14/2005 11:33:04 AM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

Of significance, IMO, is Reagan's Executive Order 12333, which specifically directs the FBI, DOD and CIA to cooperate and share info. (Summarized here http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/abledanger.asp)

By all accounts, the failure to prevent 911 was the result of intelligence failures and the failures to share info.

Why, because the Clinton Whitehouse, Reno and Gorelicker told them not to share intel info!


37 posted on 08/14/2005 11:45:43 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

save


42 posted on 08/14/2005 12:01:47 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

the information got to some but not all of the commissioners

Do we know WHO received it?
If it was Gorelick, that would be damning.


45 posted on 08/14/2005 12:13:20 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76; All
Able Danger, 9-11 Report, Gorelick, and so much more...

Click the picture...


53 posted on 08/14/2005 12:48:56 PM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76
... no reason to dismiss evidence unless your outcome is predetermined, ...

Well, the predetermined outcome was to come up with evidence that the Bush administration knew about the pending attacks before they occurred. When they couldn't prove that, they decided to go no further.

60 posted on 08/14/2005 1:23:54 PM PDT by Real Cynic No More (Al-Jazeera is to the Iraqi War as CBS was to the Vietnam War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: george76

If the Commission staff had conducted a legit investigation, they'd just publish a transcript of their 2003 Afganistan interview with Able Danger officers to prove there was no mention of Atta. Maybe Commission staff made their notes Gorelick friendly because Pentagon lawyers referenced Commission member and former general counsel of DoD Gorelick in their denial to the Able Danger request to inform the FBI. For such an important investigation, why weren't interviews recorded?

Without recorded interviews, analyzing discrepancies and doing followup interviews would be impossible. How would a legitimate investigation analyze a discrepancy between what Able Danger officers and Pentagon lawyers said about turning Atta info over to the FBI without a transcript of those interviews?

From the beginning, Commission staff dismissed any information that didn't fit the final report and made sure there was no recorded evidence they were told anything that didn't fit the final report.


69 posted on 08/14/2005 4:00:07 PM PDT by yoswif
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson