TKS?
a name to remember...
Sounds like Snell's conflict is as malodorous as Gorelick's.
bttt
Good one.
If I'm not mistaken, Mr. Snell (actually I think it's "Schnell") was also a fairly high-ranking member of the 9/11 Commission staff. I'll try to find a link for that; I'm certain that I've seen it cited here on FR.
The point to remember is that the 9/11 Commission
public hearings were nothing but a staged attack
on President Bush. What more is there to said about
whether they would lie to protect themselves?
Collusion in it's highest form. The memos could be the Blue Dress, how can the New york Times, Time, News Week, The Globe, LA Times, not be interested in what these memos have to say. The only answer is their exposure would be devastating to the Liberals.
"Czech intelligence insists happened and to this day is only refuted by US sources because Atta's cell phone was used in the US when he was supposed to be in Prague."
Sorry. But this is intellectually lazy. The 9/11 report listed quite a number of reasons to disbelief the Czech account. The cell phone was just one of many.
It is misinformation like this that hurts getting to the truth.
The *co-prosecutor* in the 1993 WTC case turned down information regarding another terrorist plot? What?
That isn't all. Snell was also made Senior Counsel and was part of the a "team leader" for the 9/11 Commission!
Oh. It gets better! One of the possible scenarios of Operation Bojinka was to crash dive an airliner into CIA headquarters.
So... Snell turned down an offer regarding information that had direct implications concerning 9/11. And guess as to who hired Mr. Snell? Anyone?
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/
Good blog on the subject, check his blogs from the past few
days. Found him on Hugh Hewitt's web page.
http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/mt/
Good blog on the subject, check his blogs from the past few
days. Found him on Hugh Hewitt's web page.
This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer.
Has anyone heard Weldon or anyone else state that Able Danger can place Atta in Prague? If we can do this, it will virtually kill the left and their mantra that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/05226/553271.stm
Another thing: could there be two Mohammade Attas?
Of significance, IMO, is Reagan's Executive Order 12333, which specifically directs the FBI, DOD and CIA to cooperate and share info. (Summarized here http://www.homelandsecurityus.com/abledanger.asp)
By all accounts, the failure to prevent 911 was the result of intelligence failures and the failures to share info.
Why, because the Clinton Whitehouse, Reno and Gorelicker told them not to share intel info!
save
the information got to some but not all of the commissioners
Do we know WHO received it?
If it was Gorelick, that would be damning.
Well, the predetermined outcome was to come up with evidence that the Bush administration knew about the pending attacks before they occurred. When they couldn't prove that, they decided to go no further.
If the Commission staff had conducted a legit investigation, they'd just publish a transcript of their 2003 Afganistan interview with Able Danger officers to prove there was no mention of Atta. Maybe Commission staff made their notes Gorelick friendly because Pentagon lawyers referenced Commission member and former general counsel of DoD Gorelick in their denial to the Able Danger request to inform the FBI. For such an important investigation, why weren't interviews recorded?
Without recorded interviews, analyzing discrepancies and doing followup interviews would be impossible. How would a legitimate investigation analyze a discrepancy between what Able Danger officers and Pentagon lawyers said about turning Atta info over to the FBI without a transcript of those interviews?
From the beginning, Commission staff dismissed any information that didn't fit the final report and made sure there was no recorded evidence they were told anything that didn't fit the final report.