Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sensors, cameras to record tailpipe emissions in California (Got Emissions?)
AP on Bakersfield Californian ^ | 8/14/05 | AP - Los Angeles

Posted on 08/14/2005 10:31:59 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Sensors and video cameras on Southern California freeways could begin recording pollutants spewing from tailpipes by early next year as part of a program to reduce smog levels in the nation's smoggiest region.

The program, perhaps the largest of its kind, would measure vehicles entering freeways in the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino and Riverside.

The sensors measure pollutants as vehicles accelerate and the cameras snap an image of the license plates.

There's even an incentive to getting caught.

Owners of smoky clunkers would receive letters informing them that the government would help pay to fix or scrap the vehicles. Between 10,000 to 20,000 of the dirtiest vehicles would be spotted, according to the South Coast Air Quality Management District.

"You can't meet our air quality goals without addressing this problem," said Victor Weisser, chairman of California's Inspection and Maintenance Review Committee, which oversees a separate program that requires vehicles to be smog-checked.

"We have made great strides with cleaner gasoline and new engines, but you can't make bigger reductions until you get some of these cars off the road," he added. "And unless we do something, these cars from the 1980s are going to be on the road a long time."

The state's smog-check program tests about 10 million vehicles every year, keeping some of the dirtiest off the road. Still, officials say the program has a loophole - vehicles built before 1976 and those newer than six years old are exempt from the checks.

Air regulators say using sensors and cameras would encourage more people to send their vehicles to the junk yard - by far cheaper at cleaning the region's air than imposing additional controls on power plants and refineries.

Air regulators, who fear violators would avoid the sensors, wouldn't disclose how many sensors will be used or where they will be placed.

State regulators approved using sensors in October 2003 and called for the program to be in place by the 2010 federal deadline.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; cameras; emissions; sensors; smog; smogcheck; tailpipe

1 posted on 08/14/2005 10:32:00 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

They've been around since the mid 90s, at least. Maybe the law is new.


2 posted on 08/14/2005 10:32:58 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

A good start would be at the San Ysidro border crossing... north bound traffic....


3 posted on 08/14/2005 10:34:51 AM PDT by JoanneSD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How many zillions of dollars will that system cost? Why not just set up a toll free number? Anyone stuck behind one of these clunkers would be happy to make a cell phone call (of course not while driving 'cause there might be a camera for that)!


4 posted on 08/14/2005 10:36:38 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Freedom of speech makes it much easier to spot the idiots." [Jay Lessig, 2/7/2005])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Regardless of the DRASTIC reductions in vehicle emissions, the liberal government of California keeps inventing problems and WAYS TO WASTE MORE TAX DOLLARS. As if we have the tax dollars to waste -- with many billions of debt, the overhead bill ($10B) per year to take care of our criminal illegal aliens....now we have to spend money on sensors, another useless bureaucracy to fund -- we must keep up our record TAX AND SPEND liberal image!!!!

Where is my barf bucket ??


5 posted on 08/14/2005 10:38:13 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SteveMcKing

I hope diesel trucks and busses will be included in this program.


6 posted on 08/14/2005 10:38:40 AM PDT by nycgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

this is a good idea, much better then the tailpipe tests. because (at least here in NY) there is so much fraud with those, and cars that cannot pass are never caught, and you see these poorly maintained cars spewing pollution, and there is no enforcement.


7 posted on 08/14/2005 10:40:31 AM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanneSD

Exactly, I was wondering how they would be able to spot their vehicles, to exempt them from this foolishness.


8 posted on 08/14/2005 10:42:38 AM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (This tagline is temporarily closed for re-modeling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Air regulators, who fear violators would avoid the sensors, wouldn't disclose how many sensors will be used or where they will be placed.

Haul them to the damn border and "sense" the emissions from trucks crossing the borders illegally, nimrods.

9 posted on 08/14/2005 10:45:07 AM PDT by ScreamingFist (Peace through Stupidity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

In Washington, if you can't afford to fix up your car if it fails emissions, you can pay a $500 fine and keep driving. Does that sound more like a way to truly cut emissions or a way to make money for the govt?


10 posted on 08/14/2005 10:45:27 AM PDT by conservative cat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nycgal

Probablu not, They have lobbying groups or are part of the goobermint, Were just voters, and don't matter.


11 posted on 08/14/2005 10:45:52 AM PDT by Not now, Not ever! (This tagline is temporarily closed for re-modeling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

God help those who fart in the crosswalk!!!


12 posted on 08/14/2005 10:50:19 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
We used to have emissions testing as a requirement to renew your licence plates. What a scam that was! The last time I had to have the test, I flunked at the first station I took it to. I then took it to another gas station and passed.

I then filed a complaint with the local Sec. of States office and they sent a field agent with me to go back to the station where I failed. The agent had the owner give my car another test and it passed. I'm pretty sure the station owner wasn't doing anything wrong on purpose I just think that the testing equipment was not that reliable.

13 posted on 08/14/2005 10:53:41 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (What is a homosexual Islamic Jihadist going to do with 72 virgins? Can he give them away?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nycgal

The beauty of the sensors is that they detect invisible emissions. Just because diesel emits ugly black fumes doesn't make it more toxic, in fact it is arguably easier to wash out of the atmosphere as large "soot" particles than the CO or CO2 gas that regular cars put out (same is true for lung clearance, which comes as a shock to "light" cigarette smokers).


14 posted on 08/14/2005 10:57:37 AM PDT by SteveMcKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

They already have a toll free number that anyone can call to report a polluting vehicle. It is: 1-800-CUT-SMOG. The registered owner of a reported vehicle receives a letter from DMV requiring a manditory smog check. Some people have used this number as a means to retaliate against people they don't like.

JSL


15 posted on 08/14/2005 11:05:01 AM PDT by free_at_jsl.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The sensors measure pollutants as vehicles accelerate and the cameras snap an image of the license plates.
...
Owners of smoky clunkers would receive letters informing them

Why not catch them immediately? The SCAQMD won't be able to send letters to the owners of any the cars with Mexican license plates, and some really bad cars may have changed owners (or their owners may have moved) multiple times without informing the DMV.


those newer than six years old are exempt from the checks

I thought it was four years, not six (unless things changed), and IIRC the "years" count starting from the model year, not the sale date. People with 2001 model year cars will know if they need a smog check this year.

16 posted on 08/14/2005 3:49:18 PM PDT by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson