Our president is meeting with more families than any other president ever has in time of war, to my knowledge.
Off topic:
This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer.
I hadn't heard that before; has anyone else heard this?
http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/pp/05226/553271.stm
Atta in Prague is old news, but never proven....supposedly no one believes the intel. There is a blurb about this in Stephen Haye's book 'the connection'
Off topic:
This article states that apparently Able Danger puts Atta in Prague with an Iraqi intel officer.
I hadn't heard that before; has anyone else heard this?
When the Able Danger stuff really started to break last Thursday, I read this: "And why is that significant? Because the Mohammed Atta timeline established by the Commission pointedly insisted Atta did not meet with an Iraqi intelligence agent in Prague."
I've seen nothing else that confirms it, but as you noted it keeps coming up as a suggestion in various articles. As best as I understand the theory being floated, supposedly the 9/11 Commission's timeline on Atta has this meeting in Prague never taking place, but somehow Able Danger is supposed to allow for the meeting to take place. I haven't seen it reported anywhere how that happens.
Here's the original place I first heard Able Danger/Prague, coming from NRO:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1461683/posts
I've been through some (but clearly not all) of backhoe's links and I don't see the connection between Able Danger and Atta/Prague. Everything I've read new that has come out since Thursday doesn't make the connection clear, and most of the stuff doesn't mention anything about Prague.
I wonder what the Able Danger information actually was.