[b_sharp]

"I haven't studied astrology enough to know how it makes connections between the position of stars, behavior, and future events. At least it has a wealth of detailed records based upon direct observation of current phenomena in its day, and to this day makes use of direct observation of the heavenly bodies. That is more than I can say for evolutionism. The lack of any human records detailing a 4.5 billion year old earth is just one more case of "absent" evidence."

What do you believe would make radiometrics 4.5 X 10⁹ - 6 X 10³ = 4.499994 billion years inaccurate?

[Fester Chugabrew]

What do you believe would make radiometrics 4.5 X 109 - 6 X 103 = 4.499994 billion years inaccurate?

A set of working assumptions that effects both the hypothesis and, by extension, the results.