Nope. Mainstream science operates with an intelligently designed universe, and leaves the intelligently designed aspect of it in the background. It is simply the given in which most science operates. The oddballs in science are those who would foist pure conjecture and philosphy upon science and expect the rest of the world to accept it as such.
As long as the "how" isn't evolution - Chesterism a priori rules that invalid.
Nope. I simply consider evolutionism to be invalid as science, not invalid altogether. Do you know the difference, or are such distinctions lost on you?