Posted on 08/13/2005 8:45:23 AM PDT by george76
This is the Commission's 4th version this week alone. They're lying.
I call Bull$h!+.
So even if it didn't find any results, the report never mentions the program created to find terrorists in a commission report about finding terrorists?
These commissioners must have real gullible spouses--"No, honey, even though she calls at all hours and hangs up when you answer, and you found some love letters from her, and one of her shoes in my car, I didn't feel the need to mention her because we're just good friends!"
> ... panel staff members have found no documents or
> other witnesses to back up claims ...
Did they make any effort at all to look?
My guess is that they instantly went into cover-up mode
when Atta's name came up.
Turn on FOXNews @ noon... let's see what Weldon's take is on this.
"Nor do any of the staff notes on documents reviewed in the [Defense Department] reading room indicate that Mohamed Atta or any of the other future hijackers were mentioned in any of those documents
This does not even come close to passing the smell test.
OBTW: Is that the same reading room where Burger was stuffing his pants?
You'll notice they do not deny the charge. They claim they have not found any evidence that the charge is true.
Finding evidence depends on where you look. If one only looks in the living room, one will not find any evidence of what took place in the kitchen.
Psst: The notes are at Sandy Berger's house. Look in his socks drawer.
It sounds to me like they are saying that an officer lied to them. Was this officer under oath? Leaves more questions for the chairpersons than answers to me.
Thanks, Johnny. I have FNC on and will watch/listen to Weldon carefully.
hint:
look in the map room where hillary's billing records were found..a year later..
or
under Bill's secretary's bed..
Like clockwork.
Whenever The Sinkmeister needs cover, the MSM comes to the rescue.
YES!! It's all starting to fit together, isn't it?
I wish there was a legal way to see $$deposits into Berger's account, Cindy whosis's account, and a few others - and where it came from.
How much is it worth to cover up a major security failure caused by a MAJOR political figure, if it might mean doing some prison time?
Too late, his dog ate them.
Who has a greater incentive to lie? The officer or the staffers? I think the motive is to lie is with the staffers whose veracity and judgement is now on the line.And if the staffers wanted to cover up Able Danger would they leave behind detailed notes of the meeting?
And for those who asked, Berger took the stuff from the National Archives, not the DoD.
Did you hear Catherine Herridge say that the 9/11 Commission released its statement denouncing this evidence late Friday afternoon---"a normal practice for releasing bad news"...LOLOLOL
Weldon up soon! They have pretty much called him either a liar or cuckoo...for including this evidence in his book and on the House floor!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.